Neil Gaiman Talks To John Dvorak 65
writes "John Dvorak managed to get Neil Gaiman to come onto his video podcast and discuss writing technique and such. I'm not a huge Dvorak fan, but Gaiman will get my attention pretty much any time." Well, it is worth noting that there are other folks before Gaiman, but Gaiman's piece is excellent. As regular readers know, I've been a huge fan/proponent of Neil's work and having meet him a couple years back and exchanged some e-mail over the years it's good to see him getting the recognition he deserves. Watching this video also made me think of some other unusual pairings; I'm thinking Katie Couric doing an interview with Stephen Hawking should happen.
Head Crank? (Score:1, Offtopic)
I noticed that John Dvorak's title is "Head Crank," how do I pledge to become an "Associate Crank?" Is there any hazing involved? How many rants about technology and politics do I have to go on to become inducted? How many outlandish statements do I have to make? Oh, at this rate, I'll never become "Head Crank!"
Say it Dvorak style (Score:3, Funny)
There, fixed that for you.
"Good Omens" (Score:4, Informative)
Re: (Score:2)
Gaiman solo since Sandman (Score:4, Interesting)
Maybe it's just me, American Gods did take home the Hugo...
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
It's not just you. I have read Neverwhere and Angels and Visitations, a collection of short stories and poetry, and, while I thought Neverwhere was pretty good, it had a lot of plot holes in it and, at some points became tedious. (What ever happened to the Rat Girl? Oh, maybe he just forgot her.) Angels and Visitations was pretty early work, and it showed. Most if it was boring but the stroy about the murder of an angel somewhat foreshadowed some of the themes he worked on in the comics.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1)
You want style..... (Score:2)
Jack Vance vs everybody else is like Lagavulin vs Miller Lite. Complex flavour and deeply rewarding. Not to everyone's taste either.
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:1)
I think someone else in this discussion mentioned Good Omens, the book he wrote with Terry Pratchett. That one's been one of my favourites for a long time.
Re: (Score:2)
It is a horrible feeling when you start to think that maybe the writer, show, or team that you thought was really really good just might turn out
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:1, Interesting)
By now, intrigued, I saw and was impressed by "Mirror Mask" film - it is very successful visual represent
Honestly? (Score:2)
Re:Gaiman solo since Sandman - read "Anansi Boys" (Score:1)
However, check out his recent "Anansi Boys" - I really enjoyed that and feels a lot less forced than American Gods (which I enjoyed more on the second reading, btw)
Re: (Score:1)
I enjoyed it more on the second reading, too. I can't really pinpoint why. I think I liked Shadow a little better the second time around. And maybe I was paying more attention to Anansi, because I was re-reading it before Anansi Boys (which I really enjoyed on the first read) came out.
Re: (Score:2)
However, if you really want to read Gaiman's dark writing, look up some of his darker works without any humour. Smoke and Mirrors [wikipedia.org] is an example - some of the stories are very different and quite dark.
The thing is, Gaiman does no
1602 (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
However, if the money from 1602 helps get Miracleman back in print, then I won't regret buying 1602 at all.
Who is this invisible submitter? (Score:5, Funny)
Re: (Score:2)
But have you seen the gastroturfers who appear on foodie blogs and websites with conveniently glowing comments about how great certain recipes and restaurants are?
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
-Eric
Re: (Score:2, Insightful)
The ghost of Freddie Mercury?
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Seems that the feature might still need a touch of work...
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
Re: (Score:1)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Legs-a-licious! (Score:4, Funny)
Let me know her skirt length and maybe I'll decide then.
Re: (Score:1)
CC.
Re: (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2, Informative)
Google's image search might be a good idea for you at this point.
Re: (Score:1)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neil_gaiman [wikipedia.org]
He's even done one of the "Ask X a question" interviews here on /., but in case you missed that, here you go http://interviews.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/1 1/03/1349252 [slashdot.org]
Perhaps you should have WTFV (Watched The Fine Video).
Couric (Score:2)
She'd pass out, I'm bettin'.
Re: (Score:2)
I know I would.
Katie Couric and Stephen Hawking Won't Work (Score:1)
She can't make him cry for the camera, so what's the use?
Re: (Score:1)
So Katie, How does it feel to be in third place? "Suck Suck Suck"
Who's being interviewed? (Score:3, Informative)
Why link to PC Mag? (Score:3, Informative)
http://www.crankygeeks.com/2006/10/cranky_geeks_e
-Mattt
Even better! (Score:1, Funny)
Hawking: Equations are just the boring part of mathematics. I attempt to s...what the hell?
Couric: RRRRRRRRRRRRRGH! MORE LUBE GOD DAMMIT!
Damn, Damn and Ultra Damn! (Score:1, Interesting)
I missed Neil's Fragile Things tour and he only gets out here every couple of years. I last caught him at Keppler's when American Gods came out. I could only manage about half the book and put it down somewhere, but Anansi Boys was sterling and I've since become a bit of a fan of his works, reading Stardust and Neverwhere and enjoying them both considerably.
When last I met Mr. Gaiman, I was into the 10th year or so of borrowing a ragged copy of Good Omens from a friend. I'd finally read it and took it w
Scientologist? (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
His parents were, but it's not discussed. And this is from a former alt.religion.scientology poster and spreader of the word of Xenu. Since he doesn't discuss their lives, I'd think it rude to bring up his parents in his presence. I'd cringe if I ever heard someone asking him about it.
Apparently his parents were high-level true believers. But let it go; apparently, and per his recollections, they left him alone to make up his own
Re: (Score:2)
Is that all the evidence you have? With the same justification, one could say that he would definitely let us know that he isn't one of them if he weren't.
What's your source for this claim?
Hu? I'm sure you don't mean to imply that merely asking the question is impermissible?
Summary....? c'mon do better. (Score:2)
Irrelevant and Irrelevanter (Score:2)