The 25 Worst Tech Products of All Time 497
Khammurabi writes "PC World compiled a list of the 25 worst tech products of all time. From the article: 'At PC World, we spend most of our time talking about products that make your life easier or your work more productive. But it's the lousy ones that linger in our memory long after their shrinkwrap has shriveled, and that make tech editors cry out, "What have I done to deserve this?"' Number one on the list? AOL."
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:Bad tech? Nah... (Score:3, Funny)
Comment removed (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Bad tech? Nah... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Bad tech? Nah... (Score:4, Interesting)
And if it's a site from which you read content more than a couple of times, there's a better solution than manually clicking on the printer version each time: use the uri transmogrifier of your choice (I love Pith Helmet [culater.net].) to automatically turn urls into their printer-version form.
Re:Bad tech? Nah... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Bad tech? Nah... (Score:5, Insightful)
Strange, that's pretty similar to what we have now. If you read what they complain about, it is painfully obvious that the writer is either some 16 year old AOL basher without a clue or worse, an old elitist that wonders, "Didn't we all have private (D)Arpanet connections?"
Here's their complaints about AOL:
"How do we loathe AOL? Let us count the ways. Since America Online emerged from the belly of a BBS called Quantum "PC-Link" in 1989, users have suffered through..."
1. awful software
2. inaccessible dial-up numbers
3. rapacious marketing
4. in-your-face advertising
5. questionable billing practices
6. inexcusably poor customer service
7. enough spam to last a lifetime
8. more expensive than its major competitors
"This lethal combination earned the world's biggest ISP the top spot on our list of bottom feeders."
It goes on to say:
"AOL succeeded initially by targeting newbies, using brute-force marketing techniques. In the 90s you couldn't open a magazine (PC World included) or your mailbox without an AOL disk falling out of it. This carpet-bombing technique yielded big numbers: At its peak, AOL claimed 34 million subscribers worldwide, though it never revealed how many were just using up their free hours.
Advertisement (This is an actual paste... sorry, PC world gave me IN-YOUR-FACE advertising.)
Now, there are some valid arguments. For instance, they are notorious for screwing up your billing and not cancelling accounts properly. On the other hand, this article is targeting the original AOL. In your face advertising? Nobody but geeks knew what the net was in the early 90s. In the 90s, you couldn't exactly download the AOL client (more evidence this guy is 16). But let's go back.
Awful software: What did you expect, it ran on Windows 3.1. It was probably the only useful thing a home user ever ran on Windows 3.1
Inaccessible dial-up numbers: I had about 4 numbers locally, and most problems were because I screwed with my modem baud trying to squeeze out top speed.
Marketing: Back then, you had to convince people that they had a reason to even buy a computer, let alone get online with it.
Spam: We're placing the blame on AOL for this now?
Expensive: That's certainly true. I remember a point when they charged over $6 an hour or there abouts. Let's just say that you used your AOL time wisely (downloading all the porn you could within an hour), hehe. Yes, it would be considered highway robbery these days. Then again, so many out there are willing to pay $2 for a tv show (free to watch on your very large TV) to play on a itsy bitsy iPod screen. I'd rather pay $6 an hour for my Internet connection.
PCWorld probably made hundreds of thousands of dollars from AOL to carry their CDs for them. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.
Ever hear of CompuServe? GEnie? (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Ever hear of CompuServe? GEnie? (Score:4, Insightful)
Compuserv with those incomprehensible usernames (12345.987@compuserv.com) was just too weird for most.
AOL invented nothing.
Neverwinter Nights in graphical format instead of text.
Re:Ever hear of CompuServe? GEnie? (Score:3, Insightful)
Yeah, I was on compuserve on a 2400 baud modem attached to an apple IIgs way back in like 1992. I used to hang out in the anime chat room, "the usual restaurant" it was called. Ah, those were the days.
Re:Ever hear of CompuServe? GEnie? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Ever hear of CompuServe? GEnie? (Score:5, Funny)
Wow. They must have a HUGE basement.
Re:Bad tech? Nah... (Score:2)
OTOH, to be fair to the article, in the month or two following when they first went to unlimited time it was near impossible to get anything but a busy signal, especially in the evening, and at least where I lived. We actually took to dialing the AOL number with our phone and, when we finally didn't get a busy signal, quickly hitting the sign-on. Usually th
Re:Bad tech? Nah... (Score:3, Informative)
ITs not in the past when things they did were rough. Today they are worse as they are freaking out how to keep their 7 million customers that are left and leaving by the day.
Its not billing problems. Its intentional fraud that we are supposed to do to prevent you from leaving and charging everything for. If I recall the most cancellations an hour you were allowed to do was 4 an hour. (I could be off? ).
Bad was not even th
Re:Bad tech? Nah... (Score:2)
See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YGuBx6Xj-PE [youtube.com]
Ehm you are wishing here (Score:3, Insightful)
As for DRM, well that is still around and doing a brisk trade. Expect to see a lot more of it in the future.
I think you and the article author mean two different things. He means tech that was a failure. Not tech that is hated.
Big difference.
Yes on a list of most hated tech DRM and popups would be serious contenders but that is a list for another time. Grant
Re:Bad tech? Nah... (Score:3, Informative)
Re:Bad tech? Nah... (Score:4, Insightful)
Missing entry (Score:4, Funny)
Good list... where's X10?
And, if you include Windows ME, where's Windows 3.1? Actually, it might not be a bad idea to have an honorable mention "collection" entry and include all of the horrible Windows versions.... (95, CE, ME, NT)
Re:Missing entry (Score:2, Informative)
Lousy nasty sleazy company, but their product is cheap and works as intended. What's wrong with the product?
Re:Missing entry (Score:3, Funny)
Reminds me of the User Friendly Sunday comic that announced the combined product "Windows CEMENT ... hard as a rock and thick as a brick."
#1 on the list should be (Score:5, Funny)
Re:#1 on the list should be (Score:2)
Re:#1 on the list should be (Score:2, Funny)
#1 on the list should be (Score:3, Funny)
by Penguinshit (591885) on Friday May 26, @04:31PM (#15412305)
Windows ME
Don't you mean Windows Me running AOL from an Iomega Zip drive?
Re:winme: not that bad (Score:2)
I had an entire office running on it (installed prior to me coming there). It never worked reliabl, and not at all in terms of being a Domain member.
I couldn't get them onto W2K fast enough. Once that was done, all problems (except the self-inflicted "must have porn email from friends") were solved.
Re:winme: not that bad (Score:2)
Re:#1 on the list should be (Score:2)
Zip Drive? (Score:4, Informative)
It was good in my opinion, it just never developed fast enough in terms of capacity.
Re:Zip Drive? (Score:5, Funny)
And it made cool clicking sounds after extended usage...
Re:Zip Drive? (Score:2)
Hmmm, that reminds me, I'd better back up all those old disks before I decomission my old PC and can't access them anymore....
Re:Zip Drive? (Score:2)
I still have one and yes it was good (Score:3, Insightful)
The advance of cd burners (and later usb drives) coupled with the click of death and the high cost of zip disks and their small capacity just made them obsolete.
It wasn't bad tech. Just had a very limited lifespan.
Re:Zip Drive? (Score:2, Insightful)
Yeah, the list in question is hugely suspect, and many of the entries are inane. They jump between truly terrible tech, to products and companies that just didn't change with the market. The Zip drive was hugely important and successful (even if the "Clik!" had some technical faults). PointCast was a great solution as well, opening up a lot of people's eyes to the multimedia potential and in
Re:Zip Drive? (Score:5, Informative)
And if that was just the way old drives failed, that wouldn't have been such a big deal. The problem was the that click of death was, quite literally, contagious: the drives used tracks on disks to recalibrate their head placement.
This meant that one bad drive would write disks with misaligned tracks, which could then be put into a previously-healthy drive, causing it to misalign its heads to the bad tracks, at which point it would write bad tracks to other disks, which when put into other drives would misalign their heads...
You get the idea.
PC Jr. was bad but... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:PC Jr. was bad but... (Score:4, Interesting)
It also had more colors and a much better sound chip than the regular PC.
IBM replaced the chicklet keyboard for free within 6 months or so with a regular one. and dont forget they were wireless keyboards! Pretty cool for 1984!
Over all, my PCjr was a joy, and I loved it up until I got my Apple ][GS (which I loved, but a lot of others hated as well)
Random_Amber
Packard Bell (Score:5, Insightful)
-Matt
Re:Packard Bell (Score:2)
All I had to do was replace the fan once, and replace the memory when it was new. (grr)
The service sucked, the machines were subpar in general, but this one was like the gremlin that hit a million miles.
Re:Packard Bell - Durable P166 (Score:2)
You screwed up the name, it's Packard Hell (Score:2)
We held the video ram in place with a piece of electrical tape. If we didn't, jostling the case caused the SOB to fall out, and we'd have to tip the case over to rattle the RAM chip out.
what about..., (Score:4, Funny)
Re:what about..., (Score:2)
#1) Lotus #2) freaking #3) Notes (Score:4, Insightful)
Microsoft Bob continues to take a beating that I think is unfair. (I wonder how many of the people who talk about it have ever seen it.) It was pretty useless, true, but it was also an attempt to be genuinely innovative, and deserves credit for failing while trying to do something really new.
Re:#1) Lotus #2) freaking #3) Notes (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:#1) Lotus #2) freaking #3) Notes (Score:2)
Wholeheartedly agreed (Score:2)
Re:Wholeheartedly agreed (Score:2)
funny thing is half of the artical i didnt' read because i saw the name and was like yeap..
Re:Realplayer?? (Score:2)
You guys are slacking (Score:5, Funny)
Soon MS bashing will be 3rd or 4th post on every thread...then where will Slashdot be?
Re: (Score:2, Funny)
of ALL TIME? (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:of ALL TIME? (Score:3, Insightful)
I think the in-car phonograph beats that.
Re:of ALL TIME? (Score:2)
Re:of ALL TIME? (Score:3, Funny)
I guess it was that phone that taught me how to dial by hand with the cradle switch, so it did have some redeeming value. But it didn't make it any less silly.
Re:of ALL TIME? (Score:2)
What about CGA monitors? (Score:5, Funny)
I mean look at this crap. [imageshack.us]
I grew up playing King's Quest and think he was just sunburned, or embarrased all the time.
Re:What about CGA monitors? (Score:2)
Re:What about CGA monitors? (Score:2)
EGA, now that's just cool.
Re:What about CGA monitors? (Score:2)
Yup, CGA should have made it somewhere. Never actually had a CGA monitor, it looked just as good emulated to monochrome
Re:What about CGA monitors? (Score:2)
Incidentally, the music to Ultima III is one of the ultimate tests of SID emulation in any C64 emulator. I've not heard a single one get it just right, especially the "spooky" dungeon music. I'm pretty sure that the spell casting effect of inverting the video that caused a mild screeching sound was actually a deliberate sound effect. Certainly does
Apple puck mouse (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Apple puck mouse (Score:2)
Thank you puck mouse!
Number one on my list... (Score:2, Insightful)
The reason? It has trained at least one, and probably two, generations of computer users to expect the computer to be fragile. It has made those people afraid to simply experiment with the computer because they might do something to "break" it.
This is a big reason there are so many people who don't want to learn how the computer works. By training at least one generation of people that computers are fragile, Microsoft has in a single stroke managed to limit people's willingness to learn a
Re:Number one on my list... (Score:2)
Linux is nearly usable for the mass market now; much less 10 years ago.
* We would be left with apple and *nix vararies, and face it, much of the world isn't ready for linux yet (I still can't get linux to work on my laptop properly), and without competition macs would be even more expensive.
Re:Number one on my list... (Score:4, Insightful)
More to the point, in the absence of Windows, we might well have a whole bunch of computer makers still duking it out. It seems people have forgotten what an explosion of PC (in the general sense, I mean) makers there was in the 80's -- more diversity than we've ever seen since. Apple is just the only one that survived the "IBM compatible" onslaught. Imaging what the computing world would be like if DEC, Commodore, Atari, Wang, Tandy, and who knows how many others were still making their own machines. There would be more competition, more pressure for open standards, and better computers at better prices for everyone.
Re:Number one on my list... (Score:2)
Re:Number one on my list... (Score:3, Insightful)
The reason? It has trained at least one, and probably two, generations of computer users to expect the computer to be fragile. It has made those people afraid to simply experiment with the computer because they might do something to "break" it.
Havent used too ma
AOL? Come on, it's all about your target market. (Score:3, Insightful)
Doesn't matter if it costs 2x as much as any other ISP, or that the interface is so kludgy that you need to upgrade your video card, or that they censor the Internet to conform to it's mass majority of users' tastes, or that the "You've got mail" sound that hasn't changed...(ever?) makes most people want to wretch all over their keyboards, or that their spyware/virus "protection" is a miserable failure and should be uninstalled, or that their "Here's your 20th CD-ROM this month" ad campaign is probably the worst landfill culprit since the pet rock, or.....
Yeah, I guess they deserve it. =p
Realplayer (Score:2, Flamebait)
Wait a minute! (Score:3, Funny)
useless list whining (Score:2)
On the other
Zip drives... (Score:5, Interesting)
They really could have replaced the 1.44 floppy disk if they had tried hard enough. I still have my old blue iomega 100 SCSI zip drive chugging away but I don't use it as much any more now that USB flash drives are almost everywhere and can finally run on everything short of DOS.
Just wait a gosh darn minute, here.... (Score:5, Insightful)
Contrast that with some items on the list that were complete disasters from the moment they were launched: IBM PC Jr., CueCat, Microsoft Bob... THOSE belong on the list. The list probably should have included some other items that had lofty ambitions but just never "took" (like OS/2). But, like I said, some of the ones on the list, I feel, aren't getting their due. We look at them now and see how worthless they are by today's standards (you can probably get any of these items on eBay for $5, now), but that ignores the impact they had when they were first released.
How about the segway? (Score:5, Insightful)
2k for a bizarre scooter that was supposed to change my life forever? huh?
Re:How about the segway? (Score:2)
Oh, segways are amazingly useful for some things... but yeah they were being pitched as not only changing your life, but all of freakin society. "Cities will be built around these". Holy crap that was ridiculous.
I still use my CueCat! (Score:2)
PC World's website should have made the list (Score:3, Funny)
Datalink is WHAT?!? (Score:5, Interesting)
Heathens!
I wore the crap out of my Datalink until it finally died in a pool in Arkansas of H2O exposure. Show me another watch that could sync up phone lists, memos and TIME to a PC and under linux no less (yes sir!). Not too bulky and had all the needed features. I'm talking the blinkly light version here, not the USB.
Consider today's watchscape, the best that's out there are the "atomic" (*cough* radio sync) watches and for the most part none of them work quite as well or have the anywhere near the feature set of the Good Old Ironman Datalink.
The best part was holding your breath long enough for the watch to finish the transfer without crapping out. Good times, good times.
Re:Datalink is WHAT?!? (Score:2)
How was it a failure? It kept me on time to my appointments.
The actual list (Score:2, Informative)
2 RealNetworks RealPlayer (1999)
3 Syncronys SoftRAM (1995)
4 Microsoft Windows Millennium (2000)
5 Sony BMG Music CDs (2005)
6 Disney The Lion King CD-ROM (1994)
7 Microsoft Bob (1995)
8 Microsoft Internet Explorer 6 (2001)
9 Pressplay and Musicnet (2002)
10 dBASE IV (1988)
11 Priceline Groceries and Gas (2000)
12 PointCast (1996)
13 IBM PCjr. (1984)
14 Gateway 2000 10th Anniversary PC (1995)
15 Iomega Zip Drive (1998)
16 Comet Cursor (1997)
17 Apple Macintosh Portable (1989)
18 IBM Deskstar 75
Actually, you missed number zero. (Score:3)
Ooooh. What did I do to deserve that?
Well, the irony is delicious.
Lack of news (or writer's block) (Score:2)
Xray shoe fitter has to be on the list. (Score:5, Interesting)
The shoe fitting fluoroscope was a common fixture in shoe stores during the 1930s, 1940s and 1950s. A typical unit, like the Adrian machine shown here, consisted of a vertical wooden cabinet with an opening near the bottom into which the feet were placed. When you looked through one of the three viewing ports on the top of the cabinet (e.g., one for the child being fitted, one for the child's parent, and the third for the shoe salesman or saleswoman), you would see a fluorescent image of the bones of the feet and the outline of the shoes.
The machines generally employed a 50 kv x-ray tube operating at 3 to 8 milliamps. When you put your feet in a shoe fitting fluoroscope, you were effectively standing on top of the x-ray tube. The only "shielding" between your feet and the tube was a one mm thick aluminum filter. Some units allowed the operator to select one of three different intensities: the highest intensity for men, the middle one for women and the lowest for children.
Naturally children loved this gadget and kids were getting months of radiation exposure every chance they could get! I know the list is all modern technology but this product is so magically horrid it should get honorary mention...
Re:Xray shoe fitter has to be on the list. (Score:5, Funny)
Left out a few. (Score:5, Insightful)
2. The IBM AT. Just when you thought their couldn't be a CPU worse then the 8088 Intel creates the an addressing system that makes the 8088 look good. Then IBM creates new standard based in this nightmare did I mention that they created an even less standard format for the RS-232 comport? But wait there is more Microsoft creates a now OS that has a bad habit of crashing hard drives and prevent you from creating any hard drive partition bigger than 33 megabytes.
And the ever popular Disk-doubler! A great program from Microsoft that they included with MS-DOS 6. Not only did it contain code stolen from Stac but it also could lost vast amount of data on your drive!
There are so many others that should be on that list.
What About SCO Xenix/Unix? (Score:2)
My nomination (Score:2, Insightful)
Circuit City DiVX
How could they forget???
No Enron? (Score:2)
WTF Where are DIVX (Digital Video Express) players (Score:2)
Anyway, we could nitpick this
How come PCWorld didn't make this list? (Score:2, Insightful)
What, no CDi, 3DO, Sega CD or Nintendo Virtualboy? (Score:2)
IE 6??? (Score:3, Insightful)
They should have blasted IE4 -- the first IE that really muckled itself into the OS. Install IE-4 on the user's machine, and run the risk of trashing their whole OS. I saw it happen in tech support, and it led to the whole mishmash of exploits that allowed IE to get into Windows and mess up your box. The integration is better now, but the idea remains suspect.
The whole list looks whacked. AOL may not be something I would ever use, but "worst tech product???". It's an intro to the web for newbies. That doesn't make it "bad tech".
Pointcast (Score:5, Interesting)
Once in the middle of the night I got up and went out to the kitchen for a snack. Our cat was on the back of the couch staring at the Pointcast screensaver. She was transfixed. Everytime it would change, she would twitch a little. She loved to watch it while we were sleeping. I guess she liked the contrasting colors and movement.
I wrote a note to the Pointcast folks about this. They were quite amused. They sent me a T-shirt. I thought that was nice of them.
Rio 300! (Score:3)
First, the battery compartment. It was so shoddily constructed that only Duracell batteries would work. Have you ever heard of anything so absurd? But it was true. The manual even mentioned it. (Since they obviously knew about this quite serious defect, did it occur to them to fix it?) I had to return to the store because it would not work with the Energizer batteries I had on hand. You would think that AA batteries are pretty much standardized, but apparently there are slight differences among manufacturers and Diamond managed to screw it up.
Then, the false advertising. They hyped the hell out of the fact that you could use this thing to play files from Audible.com. The packaging had an Audible.com logo on it. It came with Audible.com software. But the player *did not* support Audible.com's file format! When I checked with tech support they promised support would be available with a firmware upgrade to be released, urm,
Fortunately, the Rio 300 I purchased broke 2 days after I bought it and I was able to return it to Fry's for a refund. Oh, and this is how it broke: it got hot. Real hot. Like it was going to catch on fire. Ever seen the Star Trek episode where a phaser overheats, starts to glow, and Capt. Kirk has to throw it down a garbage chute before it explodes? That's what this was like.
All that said, Rio changed owners and management several times. By the time later versions of the Rio came out, it was made by effectively a different company. The Rio Cali I bought a few years ago was a decent player. But they continued their practice of hyping their relationship with Audible.com even though their players didn't support the file format until a firmware upgrade that came months or even years after the release of the player. To this date I've never listened to an Audible.com file on a Rio--the firmware releases always happen after I've bought a newer player.
Re:OQO (Score:5, Funny)
Kind of like your first sexual experience...oh, sorry, this is slashdot...well, let me just say - don't set your expectations too high.
Use VMware (Score:2)
To be fair, XP and 2003 are easier. In roughly the same way that the last guy in the prison gang rape will probably be easier to take (if you catch my drift).
I was amazed by how many crashes I got. Granted linux gives me troubles during installs too but at least they are crashes I
Re:Microsoft Bob (Score:2)
Re:Wasn't this just on digg? (Score:2)
- AOL "was" cool before there were many dialup ISPs... most of you have been AOL users at one point or another.
- Motorola Rokr. Was there a better alternative at the time?
- The Zip Drive held more than most people's HDs when it came out. If
Re:Bad article... (Score:3, Funny)
Re:Finally, the Iomega Zip drive... (Score:3, Informative)
Zip drives only got shitty once they got really popular and Iomega started selling them by the boatload. They cut corners to pump them out faster and cheaper, and product quality suffered as a result. I didn't encounter my first Click of Death-afflicted