Want to read Slashdot from your mobile device? Point it at m.slashdot.org and keep reading!

 



Forgot your password?
typodupeerror
×
Star Wars Prequels Media Movies

Newest Star Wars Reviews Suprisingly Positive 677

Patchw0rk F0g writes "CBC is reporting on the suprising results of pre-screenings of Lucas' latest (and final) installment of his sci-fi epic. From TFA, "The advance reviews of Revenge of the Sith, the sixth - and final - Star Wars film, have been mostly positive - and in some cases outright effusive." Go figure... maybe Georgie got it right finally."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.

Newest Star Wars Reviews Suprisingly Positive

Comments Filter:
  • by m93 ( 684512 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @08:58AM (#12487382)
    and all will work out in the end
  • I see (Score:4, Funny)

    by hotbutteredhtml ( 613549 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @08:58AM (#12487385)
    "Nothing for you to see here. Please move along."

    True in so many ways.
  • final? (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @08:58AM (#12487388)
    the sixth - and final - Star Wars film

    final? aren't there supposed to be nine when they are all done?
  • Surprising? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by shreevatsa ( 845645 ) <<shreevatsa.slashdot> <at> <gmail.com>> on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @08:58AM (#12487389)
    What's so surprising? After all, A New Hope was the best one in the original trilogy, IMHO. Lucas is a great director. Just because he did something different the last two times from what you were expecting doesn't mean you'll always hate his work. So why get surprised?
    • by LiquidCoooled ( 634315 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:00AM (#12487407) Homepage Journal
      So why get surprised?

      Because this is Lucas.
      The man who changes his mind about his grand vision more often than a typical person (not a slashdotter) changes their underwear.
    • Are we sure that.... (Score:4, Interesting)

      by millahtime ( 710421 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:07AM (#12487475) Homepage Journal
      Are we sure that there wasn't a ghost writer on this one? ESB is that best and wasn't written by Lucas. Or, maybe he just learn to write this time around. Either way, I have read that it's damn good and can't wait to see it the minute it opens.
      • We shall overcome (Score:5, Insightful)

        by jfengel ( 409917 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @10:14AM (#12488122) Homepage Journal
        I'm a member of an oppressed minority group who believes that New Hope was better than Empire.

        I dunno why that is. Maybe we didn't care for some of the darkness in ESB, and New Hope was more fun. Maybe the open-ended conclusion was less thrilling than the destruction of the Death Star. Maybe it's the "freshman effect" that made Clerks better than Mallrats. (Not that ESB is anything like Mallrats. ESB is a great movie. Just less fun than New Hope.)

        It's not important why. I just wanted to state out loud that although it's accepted wisdom that Empire was better than New Hope, it's not entirely universal.

        But that's why I've said before on Slashdot that I thought that Sith had a good chance to be the best of the prequels: it ties in to what I feel is the best of the originals.
        • by Teddy Beartuzzi ( 727169 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @05:01PM (#12492494) Journal
          Preach on, brotha.

          The "Empire is the best of the three" is a relatively recent phenomena. In 1980, almost no one felt this way. All my friends and I came out of the theatre saying "Geezus, what a downer. No where near as good as the first one!" It was hard to find anyone who felt the opposite. And the box office totals showed that most of the general public felt the same, the magic wasn't as strong, fewer people were doing the "I've got to see this 12 times" thing, etc.

          In 1983, much of the opinion going into Jedi was "I hope it's better than Empire!" Turns out it wasn't, of course.

          Once the trilogy was complete, and on video etc, that's when the tide started to turn towards Empire. As a part of the whole, fans grew to appreciate it more. But as a standalone film? Can't touch Star Wars.

    • Re:Surprising? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:11AM (#12487510)
      The reason is because, unlike the last two movies, this time Lucas hired a professional acting coach [starwars.com]. When you really get down to it, the wooden acting is the worst part about these movies. The story and dialogue, while vapid, is of the same caliber of the originals, imo. The difference is that normally good actors (ever seen Portman in a non-SW movie?) come across as being terrible.

      The changelog for Episode 3 should read: "resolved issue with bad direct^H^H^H^H^H^Hacting"
    • by TychoCelchuuu ( 835690 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:13AM (#12487532) Journal
      OH NO!!! WHAT ARE YOU DOING?!?!?!?!?

      This is Slashdot man! Quick, take it all back! We have to bash Lucas somehow! Uhh, how about you say that he ruined your childhood and I make a joke about how he uses $100 bills for silly things like paper airplanes! If we hurry we can save your karma!

      Maybe if Episode III is good we can get rid of one of the seminal sources of Slashdotter rage. :D
  • Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)

    by account_deleted ( 4530225 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:00AM (#12487405)
    Comment removed based on user account deletion
    • They were not the films you were looking for....
    • by paranode ( 671698 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:32AM (#12487728)
      But there will be a lot of Slashdotters who will get on the soap box and get modded up telling you how they boycotted Episodes I and II yet at the same time those movies raped their childhood. Oh and they won't see Episode III out of principle, even though they have tickets to the midnight showing and plan to see it again the next day.

      Also they cry themselves to sleep at night holding their pillows moaning "Han shoots first!"

    • by TheHonestTruth ( 759975 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:45AM (#12487844) Journal
      Not exactly responsive: I saw both Matrix movies in the theater (Reloaded at Grauman's), but because of the reviews, and what friends said, I, to this day, have not seen Revolutions. I'd rather just pretend that the Matrix was a one-shot movie and try to forget that I saw the sequel.

      -truth

    • by stienman ( 51024 )
      In general movie reviews are relatively useless unless you know a reviewer well

      Movie reviews, like political commentary, are aimed at the fence sitters and those who haven't heard of the movie yet.

      A review won't easily change one's mind if they've already decided whether to watch a movie or not. Often they'll convince those who haven't made up their mind even if the reader doesn't know the reviewer well.

      The number of fence sitters and those who haven't heard of the movie or haven't decided often
  • by totallygeek ( 263191 ) <sellis@totallygeek.com> on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:01AM (#12487416) Homepage
    Everything should be positive about this last film. The film got a bump on the MPAA ratings for violence, which means there will be plenty of action. It shows Natalie Portman preggers, which has been a male fantasy for some time (but men wouldn't watch her in that Wal-Mart movie). And, Jar Jar has very little screen time.

  • I'll be watching (Score:4, Insightful)

    by s_wardman ( 696436 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:02AM (#12487430) Homepage Journal
    Well, I'll be watching it whether the critics love it or hate it. I like to form my own opinions.
    • by Spacejock ( 727523 )
      I've seen the original trilogy umpteen times, but I could only watch episodes I and II once each - despite having them both on DVD. I will certainly catch episide III, if only to round out the experience, but it's going to have to be something really special to make me watch it multiple times.

      George Lucas will get my cash so he's not going to be overly bothered. I'll probably wait for the DVD, though.
  • Torrent? (Score:5, Funny)

    by Saxton ( 34078 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:02AM (#12487434) Homepage
    Well, where's the torrent?
    • Re:Torrent? (Score:3, Funny)

      by arduous ( 91558 )
      Obi-wan: *waves hand* "You don't want to download the torrent"

      Saxton: "I don't want to download the torrent"

      Obi-wan: *waves hand* "You want to go home and re-think your life"

      Saxton: "I want to go home and re-think me life"
      • Re:Torrent? (Score:3, Funny)

        by Jedi Alec ( 258881 )
        * You will give me all your money and then jump into this pit *

        * I will give you all my money and then jump into this pit *

        * Yes, let's jump in the pit, we'll be down faster *

        Kinda pathetic when even a crappy computer game is funnier than the movies it's based on :/
  • by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:03AM (#12487443)
    Harry Knowles gave it a good review... that means it MUST be AMAZING!
  • Alexandra Dupont (Score:5, Informative)

    by artemis67 ( 93453 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:04AM (#12487449)
    I've been reading the reviews, too, with a bit a skepticism... but I liked this one [aintitcool.com] most of all. She's an occasional columnist for AICN, and definitely one of their better and more trustworthy writers. She trashed the last two movies, but this one, well...

    To quote:
    Q. Give us a four-word review.
    A. Bloody hell! It's good!
  • by WormholeFiend ( 674934 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:08AM (#12487487)
    Bai Ling [accesshollywood.com] (Senator Bana Breemu [chinese-starwars.com]was cut from SW3 because she did a Playboy Spread [NSFW] [sexnfun.net]
  • Watched it on sunday (Score:3, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:09AM (#12487491)
    Firstly I hated the episode one, episode two was alright. So I wasnt expecting much. This one was great, I enjoyed every bit, theres a constant dark undertone to the whole film which is whats been missing from the first two. Go and see it.

    I wont tell you how it ends...
  • by slapout ( 93640 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:09AM (#12487494)
    ---Spoiler Warning---

    Obi-Wan walks into a room full of toys and video games. Anakin is playing Super Mario Brothers.

    Obi: "Where did you get all this stuff!"

    Ana: "I've been using the force like you taught me."

    Obi: "You stole all this stuff?!"

    Ana: "Of course not."

    Obi: "Then what did you do?"

    Ana: "I used the force to see into the future..."

    Obi: "And....?"

    Ana: (Looking down at the floor. Knowing he's in trouble) "...and....and...I used it to find the winning numbers in the Naboo Lottery...."

    Obi: "Anakin!"
    • Then.. (Score:3, Funny)

      by paranode ( 671698 )
      Palpatine goes back in time and uses the numbers for himself and becomes the rich emperor of an evil empire. Lest you think he got away with it, Palpatine broke off a part of his cane while he was in the force chamber so Obi-Wan knew that he had to go back in time to prevent Palpatine from controlling Anakin and using the money to take over the galaxy. So while Obi-Wan is driving the DeLorean and...

      Wait I'm confused.

  • by 91degrees ( 207121 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:14AM (#12487544) Journal
    The lightsaber combat in eps 4, 5 and 6 especially seem a little lacklustre compared with the excitement of the big fight in episode 1. And the whole look of the series just jars a little when you have part 4 made 20 years before part 1 and really looking 20 years older even with the lick of paint for the special edition.

    Add to that the fact that Lucas clearly changed his mind a few times about where the story was going, with Leia suddenly becoming Luke's sister (and I'm not even convinced that Obi wan's lie about Darth Vader killing Luke's father was originally meant to be a lie), it would make some sort of sense.

    And then the guy can stop fiddling with the original trilogy, and "tell the story he originally wanted to tell".
    • Not sure how tongue in cheek your comment was, but I actually agree with it - Lucas should have left well enough alone with the much-beloved original trilogy, and just done a complete remake of eps 4-6 if he wasnt happy with them. After all, its nearly 30 years since the original Star Wars, and we are already seeing other remakes from the same era like "The Longest Yard" and "Amityville Horror"
  • Previews (Score:4, Funny)

    by BigNumber ( 457893 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:14AM (#12487545)
    The previews for this movie look very good. Unfortunately, they'll probably let Hayden Christiansen actually speak and that will ruin the movie. The action was fine in both of the prequels so far, it was the god-awful script and acting that made me want to repeatedly stab my brain with an ice-pick.
  • Nothing but content (Score:3, Informative)

    by afchacke ( 882167 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:17AM (#12487571) Homepage

    There is a version of the article [www.cbc.ca] with just the content, no snazzy graphics.

    Content is king.

  • BBC (Score:3, Informative)

    by rune.w ( 720113 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:24AM (#12487642)
    The BBC has some reviews too: http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/film/4528 639.stm [bbc.co.uk]
  • by jtpalinmajere ( 627101 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:25AM (#12487650)
    I actually liked the first two movies... the dialogue wasn't exactly mind blowing... even dull at times... but they were still very entertaining by and large. However, I have a feeling that, story aside, if Darth Vader had been in the first two movies I think they would have gotten a much bigger reception. All of the original trilogy had Vader in it in all his 3V1L L337 coolness, and all three of them were very good... the third only dropping off mildly from the first two.

    Now that Vader is finally coming back onto the screen he has everybody fawning again. I have a sinking suspicion that the dialogue and acting is going to be similar to that of these last two movies (essentially what makes them 'horrible' in many people's eyes), but its got Lord Vader... so it's AAAAALLLLLL good. My $0.02.
  • by Stonewolf57 ( 833593 ) <stonewolf57@hotmail.com> on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:29AM (#12487696)
    To the author of this article:
    Finally got it right? So it somehow seems that George messed up some critical point in the original three? I think an obssessed legion of fanatical Lucas zealots and Star Wars freaks would beg to differ with that statement. Aside from that, yeah the Phantom Menace wasn't so great. Jar Jar Binks was incredibly annoying (can they please, PLEASE KILL HIM this movie? I'd love to see Jar Jar's fricking head get lopped off with a lightsaber; hell I'd pay money just to see that one scene by itself) and was far to prominent in the movie, but Attack of the Clones was pretty good. Particularly the end battle scene in the arena, and Yoda stepping up to the plate againest Count Dooku were particularly good. Personal opinion: take your opinion and shove it pal. With the exception of Phantom Menace I've liked all the movies, and I don't doubt Revenge of the Sith will be great as well.
  • by Apreche ( 239272 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:35AM (#12487753) Homepage Journal
    I have an optimistic crackpot theory. I'll write it in PHP because that's what I'm using mostly as of late.

    if( in_array( 'Darth Vader', $movie ) ){
    return awesome;
    }else{
    return poop;
    }
  • by Durzel ( 137902 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:41AM (#12487814) Homepage
    To be honest though Lucas didn't have an awful lot to do for this film - he already knew how it had to end. I'm no writer but I'd wager it is a lot easier to formulate a screenplay when you already know exactly what it has to achieve to be considered a success.

    Contrast that with Episodes I and II, where Lucas had very little in terms of pre-ordained plot development - the result was obvious, Jar Jar Binks et al.

    Not to mention of course that since Episodes I and II were poorly received (62% [rottentomatoes.com] and 65% [rottentomatoes.com] respectively), reviews of this film were (and are already) bound to draw comparisons and as such favour it accordingly anyway.

    For me one of the worst things about the previous two films in the franchise is that because they were continuations (albeit prequels) of what had already become legendary - no one had to try very hard. As a result the acting is wooden, the dialogue stunted and insincere, etc. Reminds me of the cringeworthy Matrix sequels.

    Anyway, I personally believe that if the film didn't happen to include the words "Star Wars" in the title, that we would be seeing completely different reviews. And I consider myself to be an avid Star Wars fan to boot.
  • by Bazzargh ( 39195 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @09:58AM (#12487977)
    ... and boy was that intriguing! can't wait to see whats coming in Episode 4!
  • by davidmcw ( 97565 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @10:04AM (#12488034) Homepage
    Lets be frank here and I'm not trolling.

    Nothing will be good enough for the Slashdot crowd. He could film it in super douper total emersion 3D-o-vision with the best script & acting on the planet and there will still be compaints from many of the Slashdot crowd. He could choose to be totally divorced from the bloody thing and people will still hark back to how it isn't quite as good as the one they saw while in their nappy 25 years ago, and George has spoiled.

    Hindsight is invariably 20-20 and rose tinted. People seem to forget that the originals had their very dodgy moments too. What people remember is not just the movie, it is the whole experience that they had when sitting there many moons ago, before the got old and embittered by age and by supporting Windows boxes (coz supporting Unix doesn't embitter one as much does it). It was going with their parents, getting popcorn, sitting surrounded in awe by peers, with their parents or older siblings. Playing with X Wing fighters for weeks afterward. It was getting all the mags & figures & watching the cheesy kids shows jump on the bandwagon. It was the fact that this was totally new, nothing else came close.

    I watched the rest, I await the next as does everyone else here, even those that refuse to admit it.

    Oh and just to piss off the remaining readers I haven't offended yet, I love my TiVo.
  • by peter303 ( 12292 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @10:12AM (#12488108)
    At first when I saw this headline [contactmusic.com] on Matt Drudge, perhaps Speilberg was sad because the yet this was yet another cheesey episode in a long melodramatic series. However, the article says Steve was genuinely moved by the film.
  • by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) ( 613870 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @10:33AM (#12488321) Journal
    Acting by the guy (whose name I refuse to learn) who plays Annakin: 0/10
    Acting by by the grits woman: 1/10
    Acting by Ewan MacGregor: 2/10
    Overall story: 6/10
    Nostalgia value as we see the things we recognise from Episode IV: 8/10
    Effects: 8/10
    Pleasure from hearing Princess Leia's theme again: 8/10
    Enjoyment value for those with a fetish for hand amputation: 9/10
    Intelligence of characters who don't notice how Padme became pregnant: 0/10
    Entertainment value of Yoda's big fight: 6/10
    Entertainment value Yoda's big fight would have had if we hadn't seen it before: 10/10
    General Grievous's homage to Harryhausen's Kali: 9/10
    Amount of sense General Grievous subplot made after editors removed vital explanations from movie: 3/10
    Did I mention Annakin's acting?: 0/10
    Quality compared to Episodes I and II: 10/10
    Quality compared to Episodes IV and V: 5/10
    Overall: 7/10
  • by frenchgates ( 531731 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @10:47AM (#12488444)
    If you haven't seen this take on Return of the Jedi [filmthreat.com], you must. Not only is it hilarious and right on the money, it even predicts and explains the crapiness so prevalent in Eps 1 & 2.
  • by DroopyStonx ( 683090 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @12:07PM (#12489289)
    I'd say the only disappointing aspect of this movie is lack of Vader himself in his suit. Sure, Anakin technically becomes Darth Vader before the shit hits the fan, but it's not the same without the suit. Even then it's not disappointing considering what happens before it, but it just makes you want more.

    It'd be nice to see more of Vader himself going ape shit, but you only end up seeing that in the last few minutes when he awakens after being operated on and learning about what had happened. I mean, you'd expect some scenes containing mass genocide or some form of magnificent display of "Hey, I'm the most powerful being in the known galaxy, watch me as I fuck you up big time."

    You see all these amazing movies that the human Vader has that the mechanical Vader never uses in the later movies. It would just be nice to see mechanical Vader utilize all these swift "magical" moves that apparently have deteriorated over time.
  • duh (Score:3, Insightful)

    by Da_Big_G ( 3880 ) on Tuesday May 10, 2005 @12:17PM (#12489371)
    Name one movie where the pre-release reviews weren't positive. The film companies control what gets said about their movies and they're not about to let some critic slam their film before the public's paid millions to see it. And if a critic DID write a negative pre-release review, he'd never get to see another pre-release.

I tell them to turn to the study of mathematics, for it is only there that they might escape the lusts of the flesh. -- Thomas Mann, "The Magic Mountain"

Working...