Machine-Grown Housing 111
Eric Harris-Braun writes "Over at Wired, Bruce Sterling has a story about a new way of looking at architecture and building. In fact, computer sculpting of housing is already being done, and non-planned building as an architectural philosphy, is as old as we are, as you can read in The Hand Sculpted House."
there's a reason for safety regs (Score:4, Insightful)
And when it collapses under the weight of that flock...
wtf... this dude is nuts.
Re:there's a reason for safety regs (Score:1)
that's what makes it art!
I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:5, Interesting)
I believe that they did this in UC Berkeley. Instead of building sidewalks, they put some sod on the quad and let the students "create" the trails across the grass. Once the paths were established by thousands of students walking on the grass every day, the school built sidewalks on top of the paths and that is how the sidewalks on the quad at Berkeley were built. No one uses those sidewalks anymore, though, because the grass is so much nicer to walk on than concrete.
So the key is to build as you need, but not to build to the point where you start to avoid the thing you were building it for in the first place.
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:4, Insightful)
At first they were built as vast point-to-point straight lines miles and miles long.
This design led to very boring drives, and consequently people fell asleep at the wheel.
Modern highways the world over tend to have gradually sweeping or rising and descending layouts as a result of this.
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:1, Informative)
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:4, Informative)
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:1)
For the people who do not follow links he is only disagreeing with the X feet in Y feet portion of my comment and has as his only source one govermental employee. Not quite the level of proof a self-professed 'roadgeek' should use.
I will research this this afternoon and if I am wrong I will post saying so.
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
=Shreak
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:3, Insightful)
I disagree. The biggest cause of boredom I encounter are the speed limits on roads that could safely be driven at twice the artificially depressed rates at which traffic is often forced to flow.
Yes, for the math challenged among you, I am saying that you don't have to look far to find 55 mile per hour limits on roads that could safely be driven at 110. As a practical matter, I realize that a somewhat lower limit
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
If you're bored driving 85 miles per hour then I suggest that you start smoking some stronger weed while you're driving.
Or get a motorcycle.
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
I used to have a motorcycle. My hip is all healed up now and I can walk fine again. Thanks for the suggestion. :-)
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
This design led to very boring drives, and consequently people fell asleep at the wheel.
Man! We were so close! A blip of about 30 or 40 years between those straight stretches of highway, and self-navigating vehicles.
How much easier would it have been if when those straight stretches were built, to imbed some magnetic waypoints. Dang.
Let's get the motoring details Audi the way. (Score:1)
My memory on some of this is a bit rusty, and maybe I never knew what I was talking about in the first place but it's easier to post than research so....
Early on, the Germans - originators of the modern high-speed road network - learned that drivers get "hypnotised" on long, straight stretches of road so they began to design the autobahn with plenty of sweeping curves and gradients. The topography of much of the countryside helps with this, too.
The US Interstates were built much faster and cheaper, and th
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:3, Interesting)
I think students have been trying this as schools all over the country. They walk were it makes sense, and you can see the beaten paths were they go, thus were the sidewalk should be.
Unfortunately the school i went to, Penn State, decided that if students make a path across an area, that the best solution is to put up a drooping chain fence, or to put some scrubs at the ends of were they walked. Instead of just getting rid of the paths no one uses and moving them to were they do. Unfortu
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
Nor is wood chips that float away every time it rains, Virginia Tech! (yes, they actually tried that!)
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
When i visited DC a few years back I noticed that many of the paths along the mall were not concerete or asphalt, but rather crushed stone on dirt. I thought it was the best thing about the visit, besides a few of the rockets at the air and space museum of course, that the seat of power for the US government didn't pave over its paths. Something symbolic about that as well as practical. I'm guessing s
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
PSU is also the place that invented spray on grass, basically grass seed, with liquid fertilizer and green pigment. They spray it on bare dirt and it it looks like grass from a distance, then in time real grass should grow. But from what i saw that rarely happens and it just gets washed into cracks in the first rain.
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:1)
That's why we invented stairs.
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:1)
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:4, Informative)
The next step for Berkeley is to pave the footpaths with something that feels as good as grass, is more fun, and easier to keep up. Take old rubber tires and cut them into 1 cm. chunks. Mix that with a slury of earth and a white polymer, and you get a cool, soft, inexpensive material that is waterproof and resilient. It'll give as you walk on it, and feel good to the bare footed. It'll last years and can be chewed up and reused if, and when the paths change.
By making the spaces conform to human use, and by making the space intelligent enough to conform as humans use the space, you eliminate space as the primary constraint to human creativity and imagination. This is the evolution of the conscious environment. This is the trend, creating places for human beings that honors our need for shelter, but removing the artificial limitations of social construct. We're genetically predisposed to tribalism. Our religion and societies have worked against that. It'll be interesting to see what happens when the forces that shape our interactions begin to yield to the fundamental designs of our own humanity. I for one welcome the change.
Genda
-- The best way to teach a generation to think outside the box, is to eliminate the boxes...
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
Methinks that we're genetically predisposed to organized religion and stratisfied societies, too. If we weren't, they wouldn't really have taken over, now would they?
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
Re:I like the idea of unplanned housing (Score:2)
It does feel good walking on recycled tyre foam, it was used as a spongy concrete-like playground safety base for awhile. Then the scuttle got out about how tyre manufacturing uses cadmium as a colour fixant, and it seems to have stopped being used.
Cadmium [scorecard.org] i
Zoneing??? (Score:2)
I don't know about you, but if I tried something like an unplaned house on my land - I suspect that the zoneing police wouldn't fine me, or even arrest me, but simply beat me to a bloody pulp! But oh, boy would I love to figure out how to get arround it.
how to get arround it (Score:1, Interesting)
Re:screw that, wheres my (Score:2, Funny)
Re:screw that, wheres my (Score:3, Funny)
Must...protect...children...
Oh, right... (Score:2, Funny)
You'll land in the bathroom/livingroom/spacedock shaped like a booger, and then you can relax in the bedroom/backyard or use your machine-built PC in the garage
I just fail to see how this amorphous abstract thing would be practical. Admittedly, it would be cool looking and unique, but still.
Re:Oh, right... (Score:2)
It would probably be more suitable for a workplace type setting, because room specs have been basically stand
Re:Oh, right... (Score:2)
Robotic Termites? (Score:3, Interesting)
Randomly constructed, on demand buildings. Sounds like the makings of a termite mound....
Sounds like (Score:1)
"Oh, my! We need a coffee maker!"
"Look! The Joneses developed one last month! Let's modify theirs and distribute it throughout the house!"
Some questions arise:
Do I need to raze my old house if I want to change distrobutions?
How many users does that model support?
What kind of designers made the graphical interface; as in: will I want to operate my house from the basement only?
Re:Sounds like (Score:1)
Re:Sounds like (Score:2)
This is the key... (Score:3, Insightful)
architecture as a human activity that involves creativity and the ability to
solve new problems as they come up.
If you tell me you can help design a bridge or a road with the aid of software,
then i'll buy it, but designing homes (what architecture is about) is way beyond the cold structure design.
Where I live, there's some kind of rivalry (sp?) between architects and what
in my country is referred as a "civil engineer", which is an engineer specialized in structural design and buildings. Both are able to build a house,
but most of the times you can easily spot the difference between a house built
by an architect and a house built by an engineer: Houses built by engineers look "clunky", and while they may be built correctly from a structural point of view, they ocasionally suffer from design flaws such as having bedrooms too close to the kitchen (which means the odor of food being cooked invades other parts of the house). Put simply, the engineer knows about functionality. They
don't know about "aesthetic design". And this is something a computer will never be able to learn either.
There's this joke:
- What's an architect?
- An architect is someone that isn't man enough to be an engineer, but not gay anough to be an interior decorator.
I think the joke sums it up nicely.
Re:This is the key... (Score:2)
Then again, what would Linus do?
Re:This is the key... (Score:1)
Geeks, nerds and techies in general seem to lack sensitivity for aesthetics. You just need a box, I just need a box, but that doesn't mean we can call a box a house.
"He just opens the drawer, grabs the first thing that will cover his skin, put it on, and go out to the street". Sounds familiar? It does to me =oP
Re:This is the key... (Score:3, Funny)
=)
Re:This is the key... (Score:2)
Perhaps one could say geeks have different priorities in aesthetics.
Re:This is the key... (Score:2)
I think the joke sums it up nicely.
Now if only you had gay and engineering relatives then the rest of the joke could be as inoffensive as the architect part.
In other words, if you believe you have to qualify your 'expertise' in delivering a joke for whatever reason, chances are good that either you aren't qualified to deliver it, or it's not
Re:This is the key... (Score:1)
You took it the wrong way. Lay down on the caffeine and relax.
Re:This is the key... (Score:2)
Re: (Score:2)
Re:This is the key... (Score:1)
They are both
Re:This is the key... (Score:2)
Granted, they'd still be ugly houses.
Re:This is the key... (Score:2)
But can it build a house using cardboard? (Score:2, Informative)
Re:But can it build a house using cardboard? (Score:3, Informative)
Re:But can it build a house using cardboard? (Score:2)
-
Re:But can it build a house using cardboard? (Score:2)
Roger Dean!! (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:Roger Dean!! (Score:2)
Re:Roger Dean!! (Score:2)
I was gonna ask "is this guy really an architect?!?", but I see from his web page that he's actually an artist or something. There are certainly a lot of bad architects out there, but I suppose they do teach you something in ar
Re:Roger Dean!! (Score:2)
True, but presumably the inhabitants will be stoned and listening to "Yessongs" most of the time, so they won't notice.
Swallowed alive! (Score:2)
Some of these shots might be nice if they didn't leave me with strong impressions of the intestinal tract...
Hobbit houses? (Score:2)
Re:Roger Dean!! (Score:2)
I almost went BLIND from the "Roger Dean" and "Achitecture" fonts alone.
-
Windows (Score:2)
the way houses are built is insane. (Score:4, Informative)
Huge portions of home building could be done in large factories, and equally huge strides could be made standarizing the hookups to electricity, communications and plumbing.
i'm not talking about crappy mobiles...i'm talking about the absurdity of custom electrical, plumbing and framing on hundreds of millions of homes.
the endless permits etc...people complain about software but if software were as absurd as home building you would have to get several CDs from various licensed contractors, get a permit from the state to install a computer, have the computer inspected as it is installed and each CD of components is inserted, etc...
Re:the way houses are built is insane. (Score:3, Informative)
Freeman Dyson's anecdote (Score:3, Interesting)
One of the anecdotes was about a research team he was invited to join during the Carter administration. A multidiciplinary team of eggheads got together to come up with ways to make housing cheaper.
They analyzed the factors that made housing expensive, and came up with a list of proposals to make homes cheaper. Factory building components, standardization . . . it all came tog
Real Estate and the age of InkJet Construction (Score:2)
What is truly interesting to consider, however, are the economic ramifications of this change. Make no mistake, this is as drastic an advancement for construction, architecture and in fact, civilization as can be.
While the switch-over to these techniques may occur slowly at first, once the kinks are worked out of the sys
Re:Real Estate and the age of InkJet Construction (Score:2)
Machines can do many things well, but something they can't account for the equivilent of a wrench getting thrown into their gears.
What if there's a problem? There are three basic kinds of problems that could occur (that i can think of at this moment): site-related, hardware/software, or materials.
The machines could, of course, make a lot of assumptions - due to their design - that things will work. This will be significantly cheaper, but result in lower-cost building
Read Alastair Reynolds' Chasm City (Score:1)
Best hard-SF/space opera writer out there right now, IMHO.
Comment removed (Score:3, Interesting)
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re: (Score:2)
Not a good idea (Score:4, Interesting)
From the article:
I have an old book around here that talks about 1890s Japanese housing, and how certain walls would be removed or replaced in the homes according to need:
What would be a parlour in the day would be divided into sleeping rooms at night.
There is the obvious problem with this: In Western architecture, rooms tend to hold big, bulky objects called furniture. Western culture doesn't tend to sit on tatami mats and sleep on shikibutons.
In our culture, changes to living space tend not to be frequent: We don't convert bedrooms to living rooms daily. When we do want to remodel our homes, we tend to hire builders and remodelers. I suspect that this will be significantly cheaper for quite awhile.
It sounds like he's trying to be innovative for the sake of being innovative.
Re:Not a good idea (Score:2)
Unless your relatives are visitng and you fold out the sofabed...
Re:Not a good idea (Score:2)
Re:Not a good idea (Score:2)
It depends on how well off you are. A lot of poor people actually do convert their living rooms into bedrooms - if only because they lack free rooms in their homes to do otherwise. While this was (and still is) VERY common all over central and eastern europe, you can see examples of it in western europe and north america as well. This is what fold-out couches and pull down wall-beds are for.
cheap, good, safe. pick 2. (Score:1)
imagine a machine you just feed sandbags into, and it crawls over the building site, laying down bags (or tires)
Great Idea -- but watch out! (Score:1)
Maybe some would use the technique to make hobbit-like houses and so on. But we'd see a lot of 5-car garages.
wow ... cool idea (Score:2)
wouldn't it be interesting to see someone print their simcity in real 3D
Maybe Brain was right.. (Score:2)
Link to the book online -
http://marshallbrain.com/manna1.htm
problems with these. (Score:3, Insightful)
I can't get over the way so many allegedly intelligent people cream themselves over these cute 3D animations of a huge behemoth lateral crane picking up building materials and laying them into place and voila, instant house. It must be the Lego lover's mindset, but it's not remotely as practical as it's proponents suggest. (And I still have no evidence that it is "already being done", all I see are drawings. But as Colin Powell proved, artistic drawings are proof of reality. But I digress.)
1. You have to lie these perfectly straight 200-foot rails down at either ends of the lot, perfectly parallel and at a perfect distance. And make sure they don't move.
2. You have to lug this huge behemoth crane on huge supports to the site and *onto the rails*.
3. You have to place all the building materials in perfectly lined up position. Who is going to do this? Construction workers? Another expensive piece of heavy machinery?
4. Who is going to climb up the damn thing when it gets jammed while carrying a 50-foot 10x10 support beam?
B: these wonderful, mod-hippie earthen building materials like cob and superadobe -- all of which are top secret and require you buying book X and going to seminar Q for a hundred here and a hundred there. Nope, that ain't the way to promote an off-the-grid natural building style, that's the way to be a beemer-driving neoliberal. Instead of these wonderfully "grassroots" building techniques going on to revolutionize building and make it accessible to the common man, cob et al become the trademark of upper-middle class SUV drivers who need a way to prove to everyone that they truly are earthy and granola.
(Let's not mention the inconvenient fact that the underprivileged and otherwise construction-disenfranchised that these cheap natural building techniques will supposedly help don't actually *own any land* to BUILD anything on!)
I'd be curious about cob... if it wasn't that every link about it I can find actually tells you *nothing* about how to do it, but instead urges you to attend a fucking paid training session. (And oh yeah, if I were in the landed class.)
I can process rich text, calculate spreadsheets, and read email for free, but I can't build with fucking mud and straw without going to some new age seminar. Funk dat.
Re:problems with these. (Score:2)
Not the end of the world. One surveyor, one worker, one afternoon.
2. You have to lug this huge behemoth crane on huge supports to the site and *onto the rails*.
Not any harder than bringing out that same huge crane to install the engineered trusses. Actually, easier. You only have to drop one robot, versus many engineered trusses.
3. Yo
Cob isn't secret (Score:3, Informative)
FYI, here goes:
- Clay, sand, staw. Clay binds, sand prevents shrinking, staw acts as rebar. Use subsoil from the site, tread in the straw. Measure your subsoil by shaking it in water and letting it settle in layers, to see if you need to add clay or sand. Make up test bricks to see if you got the mix right for shrinkage, cracking, and strength. You'll ne
Re:problems with these. (Score:1)
http://www.weblife.org/cob/
The Venus Project (cool pictures) (Score:2)
http://www.thevenusproject.com/vp_gallery.htm [thevenusproject.com]
contour crafting = brick laying (Score:2)
Cool! (Score:1)
Wiring & Plumbing (Score:2)
I wonder how they'll handle the vertical runs, like go from the water line up to the kitchen & baths? Also, every building code in the US requires a vent at the top of each plumbing stack, so for every bathroom that's not on top of another bathroom, you need a separate vent.
Chip H.