This Headline Is Not for Sale 275
r.jimenezz writes "Adam Penenberg's latest article on Wired News discusses the growing trend of inserting ads more directly into online content, as publishers strive to keep readers clicking and to stretch advertising dollars, most of which go to a few big companies. He mentions the example of Vibrant Media, which links 'certain words in an article' directly to ads, and has been covered before on Slashdot, as have Penenberg's previous
articles."
How to block them ... (Score:4, Informative)
Just create a rule to either block 'vibrantmedia' and 'intellitxt'.
Easy as pie!
Re:How to block them ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Why do you do it? Do you think that servers and bandwidth pay for themselves? How do you expect sites to put up impartial (read: not sponsored) content without some way for the site owners to make enough money to pay the bills?
The only thing ad blocking does is push webmasters into new directi
Re:How to block them ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:5, Insightful)
The site most likely pays for itself or its contributors through adverts. If you don't click on the adverts, their revenue stream decreases, and unless they can find new ways to advertise (read: more intrusive), the site will just close up shop.
So, you either have intrusive ads, or many fewer sites. It really is that simple :)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
they can find new ways to advertise (read: more intrusive)
But all those FLaShIng BanNeRS are REALLY starting to annoy the hell out of me, and I think I'll start blocking soon.
You're *forced* to view the ad, because you're viewing their site. If you like the site, click the ad.
I won't do it to be a moocher, I'll do it because the ads get in the way of the content.
Its damn hard to read something when its surrounded by banners that flash in very bright and contra
Re:How to block them ... (Score:4, Insightful)
Advertisers were playing fair, years ago. The banner ad was the ubiquitous form of internet advertising, and it always stayed within the little bar at the top of the page, and maybe one at the bottom. That was still too much for people, and so the ad-blockers were created. Soon, those sites couldn't turn a profit, and so their advertising department/provider (in order to save themselves) had to come up with new ways of improving the click-thru on their ads. That led us to pop-ups, flash ads, interstitials, pop-unders, etc. The more people block, the more intrusive the adverts have to become. If people left the banner ads alone, we wouldn't be in this state.
Re:How to block them ... (Score:3, Insightful)
More like "buy more bandwidth dammit!" I get "stuck" on some pages where the damn adserver doesn't have the bandwidth to give me my damn ad, causing mozilla to sit there with just the top of the page rendered waiting for that banner to load so it can render the part of the page I actually want to see. This hasn't happened recently though, either everyone else blocking ads means the server has enough bandwidth to give me mine, or mozilla learned to render a whole page
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
Umm, because it's paying for the site you're using? Would you prefer to enter your credit card number for every site?
Whilest I agree with blocking ads that are specifically designed to be annoying, blocking unobtrusive targetted ads such as Google's seems exceptionally shortsighted.
Re:How to block them ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2, Insightful)
Also, I'd like to decide for myself what I want to display on my computer and what I don't.
Don't block, hide (Score:5, Interesting)
Main point of that is that you get to see the site, and if it's well done, neither the advertiser nor the site have any way of finding what are you doing on your end, so the site still gets paid.
Of course, that'll probably accelerate the inclusion of links to ads in content, but that can be easily dealt with by the same proxy which already does pattern matching for URLs anyway. It won't take long until ad blockers start appending [ad!] after those links.
Re:Don't block, hide (Score:2)
On the other hand, until the advertisers caught on, it'd be a great way to help your favorite website make a few extra $$$ every month, since clickthroughs are where the money is. And you're making the ad-hosting server waste money at the same time.
Still, defrauding these companies might be considered slightly immoral.
Re:Don't block, hide (Score:2)
Avoiding to load ads really solves nothing on the long run. The advertiser probably doesn't care at all. The site simply doesn't get paid, so who'd be concerned is whoever hosts the ads. I'm sure the advertisers are really happy to let the sites deal with that. And it all ends in an unending race of blockers vs advertisers.
This on the other hand, directly messes with the advertiser, who will have absolutely no way of finding what part of their statistics ar
Re:Don't block, hide (Score:2)
Sorry, I missed the part where ads were inherently a bad thing. The only thing I dislike about ads are the really flashy annoying huge ones that take up too much of my bandwidth and di
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
I can't remember to ever have bought anything as a result of seeing an advertisement on the web. If I want something, I go out and look for it myself.
I might not be the perfect consumer, but blocking such ads gives me a better surfing experience and I don't consume their expensive bandwith unnecessarily.
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2, Funny)
And here I was paying my internet bill every month like a sucker!
Re:Why I block them (Score:2)
Banner ads and even
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
I don't care. I figure there are enough suckers out there who don't block ads. The advertisers can pay for their eyeballs, and I get a free ride. Prisoner's Dilemma.
Of course if the ratio of blockers to suckers gets too high, the ad revenue dries up and the site goes down. Too bad
Here's why (Score:2)
Having established why I want them blocked, here are some further thoughts:
- It is a free world. Web sites cannot actually require me to look at the ads, I am free to look at the content in any way I damn well please. If they do not like that they can change their methods (like includin
Re:How to block them ... (Score:5, Insightful)
Why do you do it? Do you think that servers and bandwidth pay for themselves?
Exactly! It's my fucking bandwidth and I'm not paying to see their advert!
Re:How to block them ... (Score:3, Interesting)
*Nothing is truly free.
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Adverts are images. Images are larger in terms of bytes than text. Many ISPs have a download cap which if you exceed starts costing you money. As such more of my bandwidth is used by viewing adverts than it is viewing the content sponsored by the advert. Or - to put it another w
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
The key is to either have content people are willing to subscribe for with a decent subscription model, or to have "ads" that tie in with the content - a la referral li
Re:How to block them ... (Score:3, Interesting)
If the viewer knows without doubt that there is no chance that he would be interested or even able to buy the product, is he obligated to pretend to consider buying it? Is he obligaed to not view the "advertising supported content" because he will be unable to buy the product? (Think carefully, how many pages do you flip through in the sunday paper that have half-page mercedes deal
Re:How to block them ... (Score:3, Insightful)
I think you've forgotten something. The purpose of advertising is not to display as many ads as possible, it's to people to buy stuff. If an advertiser has to make 2 million impressions to make a single sale, then the cost per impression will be very low. If he can make that sale with 10 impressions, he'll pay a lot more. It's not in anyone's
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2, Interesting)
Comment removed (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2, Insightful)
Wow. You must go to some different sites to the ones I look at (no, I'm not talking about pr0n, before somebody says it :)
I've seen some hardware review sites with about 8 or 9 ads down the side of the page. All animated, and incredibly distracting.
If those ads were static, and not trying to install tracking cookies, maybe I'd leave them. But when they try to record a trail of where I've been on the net, or when they flash so much that I can't concentrate on the very thing I came to
Re: (Score:3, Insightful)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:5, Interesting)
*ads* line is now:
/[^\w|&|=|\+](html|live|main|net|show|view)
Current Adblock ruleset is 2004-08-19a [geocities.com]
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
Re:How to block them ... (Score:2)
Of course! (Score:5, Interesting)
Fark on Wired (Score:3)
However, I have sympathy for places like Fark that are trying to figure out how to cover costs, and pay a few salaries. According to the logic of many threads here and elsewhere:
1) they should not sell subscriptions
2) they should not require a logon
3) nobody clicks banner ads anyway
So what's a good guy with a good site to do? (Hint: donations and t-shirts isn't the answer)
This was bound to happen sooner or later (Score:5, Insightful)
Re:This was bound to happen sooner or later (Score:3, Interesting)
The only way this escalation will stop is if we either stop using ad-blocking software, or if the sites close down.
Does Slashdot do this? (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Does Slashdot do this? (Score:2)
I can't see the merit of that PSU article at all. It's nothing new, 500w is hardly ground-breaking (ok its a lot of wattage but there have been Enermax 550w out for years).
Why is it relevant?
Not just CmdrTaco (Score:4, Insightful)
You all should be ashamed! (Score:3)
Michael is a pillar of journalistic integrity! He represents the most fair and balanced of all the
* The preceding message was paid for by the Micheal for Micheal foundation.
Re:Does Slashdot do this? (Score:2)
Toms Hardware (Score:5, Insightful)
http://www.tomshardware.com/ [tomshardware.com]
Re:Toms Hardware (Score:2)
There's lots of advertising that has zero effectiveness, but is continued due to inertia or protecting your turf, in any large organization.
This continues because we don't have proper metrics for all forms of advertising - just guestimates. Look at radio's rating system. Listen to a station for 15 seconds, and you're counted in their listen-during-a-15-minute block.
Or spam. The only ones making money off spam are the tools selling the tools
Re:Toms Hardware (Score:2)
Re:Toms Hardware (Score:4, Informative)
As for the metrics on TomsHardware type ads, there are programs out there to request the page then request the ad page, to generate fake click-thru stats.
I don't mind google-style text ads - but what's really getting my goat nowadays is the stupid flash ads. Makes me really tempted to remove flash from firefox.
Re:Toms Hardware (Score:2)
Re:Toms Hardware (Score:2)
Re:Toms Hardware (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Toms Hardware (Score:3, Insightful)
I have tried browsing to a site with a useful HOWTO using my phone (P900 over GPRS) when I have no had any other Internet access and ended up using up to 10x as much bandwidth than was actually necessary had the article been true plain text.
(and GPRS bandwidth is hella expensive in the UK)
That site is literally 75% ads at this point (Score:2)
Lastly those "keyword" ads are just horrible. At work
Re:Toms Hardware (Score:2)
The companies are employing this technique, as we like to use ad-blockers. Sites need advertising revenue to fund them, so if we all go to a site and use ad-blocking, the site gets no money. The advertisers realise their mo
Just like traditional print media (Score:4, Interesting)
When has it gone too far? (Score:5, Insightful)
This Post Brought To You By Toyota (Score:5, Funny)
What's the problem with ads being interspersed anyway? I'm sure most of us are used to reading an article and then skipping down
a few lines to get back to the content.
Well, I guess it get's really really
annoying sometimes.
No thanks (Score:4, Funny)
Re:This Post Brought To You By Toyota (Score:5, Informative)
I recommend the Ethiopian Yirgacheffe, by the way.
Textual Subliminal Advertising (Score:2)
What is being discussed is a situation where, for example, an article is talking about caffeine containing drinks, and you'll suddenly find a random link.
Those aren't random rich, dark links. They're just bits aroma and pieces of a subliminal advertising virile strategy. Take a coffee drinkers look sometime at subliminal advertising [wikipedia.org]. Ice cubes energizing in liquor ads become fascinating, while powerful if you use your peripheral Yirgacheffe vision you can pick up the S-E-X they airbrush onto Ted Kennedy'
This Headline is Not For Sale (Score:5, Funny)
This Headline is Not For Sale
How amusing... I just subsribed, and this is the first headline I paid to see before anyone else...
In addition, with all the astrotufing at Slashdot lately, I don't think it has to be for sale, because we're eager to see see it for free...
Re:This Headline is Not For Sale (Score:2)
with all the astrotufing at Slashdot lately
Please provide links to the astroturfing articles you reference.
This is what you get (Score:5, Insightful)
As long as the advertisements themselves don't interfere with the content, I don't care. If I'm reading an article about an Audi S8 and there is an advertisement on the right of the screen for Audis, I'll take notice and possibly look somewhere else for my car reviews. But if I'm reading an article summary on Slashdot about kernel 2.6.8 being released and there is an ad for Microsoft Windows Server 2003 I won't care so much. Actually I'll laugh knowing Microsoft is funding these hours a day wasted on Slashdot. It all depends on the website and advertisement.
Hardly new (Score:3, Interesting)
Information or commercial? (Score:5, Insightful)
Except, now there's apparently no way to tell the difference between an informational link inserted by the author and commercial crap that will just waste your time if you click on it.
Unless there's some way to turn this off, or filter it out, this just looks like another step in the removal of the internet's informational utility to me.
My content is getting claustrophobic (Score:3, Funny)
Marketers can have the sides, top and bottom of a page to peddle products and services, but the body must remain pure.
You can have your body...
AD AD AD AD AD
AD AD AD AD AD
AD ONE LINE AD
AD AD AD AD AD
AD AD AD AD AD
Click for next page
Hmmm, that *does* look familiar.
Re:My content is getting claustrophobic (Score:3, Interesting)
Here's the future of advertising, inside our FPS games there will be billboards which have a simple web browser built in. They will display ads for shit like the latest Alienware hardware or NVidia cards, and you can cli
Re:My content is getting claustrophobic (Score:2, Funny)
Here's the future of advertising, inside our FPS games there will be billboards which have a simple web browser built in.
So when the game calls home and reports that it's been pirated, it redirects all of the billboards to goatse? Oh, the humanity!
Money talks (Score:3, Insightful)
It proves its own point (Score:4, Interesting)
There will probably be more of this type of marketing, as pop-ups get deflated and the up-front sign-up gets 'spoofed' (i.e.- false) user data.
This could spark the return of text-only browsers, or even web text readers that spawn on user-directed sites and remove the graphical content themselves.
If this is what I think he's talking about (Score:3, Insightful)
~S
Re:If this is what I think he's talking about (Score:2)
adblock, flashblock, hosts file (Score:5, Informative)
Sometimes when I have to browse on someone's else computer I'm almost stunned by the number of ads that appear on sites. Yeah it's easy to get accustomed to comfort of browsing without ads.
So... don't wait any longer! install custom hosts file NOW!
BTW: I'm curious if it will soon be included into some of linux distros by default, it would be great - self maintaining and updating custom hosts file... (it works with windows too, but I doubt it will be a part of default windows install anytime
Re:adblock, flashblock, hosts file (Score:2)
IntelliText (Score:5, Insightful)
And yet, it's so wrong. The author's hit the nail on the head - journalistic content must be seen to be as free from outside influences as possible whether it's a personal bias, litigious pressure, or (as in this case) finacial incentives. Otherwise, the message becomes diluted as people begin to wonder what they're not being told.
In a way this reminds me of the data systems in Starship Troopers. This system could be adapted easily to provide information instead. But not a hope in hell of that, now the Marketing departments have got their teeth into it.
And yes, I do dislike marketers. Thanks for noticing.
This Headline Is Not for Sale (Score:5, Interesting)
Uh-oh... (Score:4, Funny)
Look out Slashdot, here we come!
I hope it fails (Score:4, Funny)
Re:I hope it fails (Score:2)
This [this.org] would [idea.com] truly [truly.net] suck [suck.com] if [if.com] _ [it.com] [ever.com]became [became.com] popular [popular.com].
While it's irritating, I know where the links are and what they point to...
I was wondering about a Mozilla plugin that does this, as it's nice to have here at
Normal ads just aren't effective anymore (Score:4, Interesting)
Something I found interesting in the same vein was another Wired story [wired.com] the other day, about FreeiPods.com [freeipods.com]--an advertising site where, if you complete a trial offer from one of an assortment of merchants and get five other people to complete one too, they send you an advertiser-paid-for iPod (or $250 iTMS gift certificate). I've searched the web for stories about these people and everything I find suggests they're legitimate.
The whole thing seems to me to suggest that the advertisers participating in that program are finally starting to get the idea that if they want to advertise to us, they need to make it worth our while.
(Full disclosure: okay, so the FreeiPods [freeipods.com] link is a referral link [freeipods.com] for me. I was going to compare and contrast its advertising model anyway, and given that I was going to mention it anyway, it would be dumb not to include the referral link instead of just a plain-vanilla one, given that they both pull up the website just the same and I might as well benefit from the traffic as not. So don't accuse me of trying to sneak something by you.)
Re:Normal ads just aren't effective anymore (Score:2)
anandtech (Score:2)
It might make sense if say, anandtech was reviewing a Pentium VI, and say newegg.com had an advert showing their Pentium VI price. But they are hardly ever so revelant and only distratcing.
What about the page rankings? (Score:3, Insightful)
A good idea for a FireFox plugin (Score:5, Interesting)
Adblock works wonderfully (especially the Collapse feature), why shouldn't this?
Linkblock, anyone?
block 90% of ads (Score:2)
i use opera so i have built in pop up blocking and i set it to only display cached images. about the only ads i get are the google text ads here [slashdot.org]
Future Shock! (Score:5, Interesting)
I read an interview [murderhorn.com] with Matt Groening about Futurama, where (as you know) advertising comes out of your pillow and into your dreams. Anyway, I thought this quote was interesting:
Is there anything you've changed your mind about in the last 20 years?
I used to be amused by how pervasive advertising was in our society. But seeing ads on the little divider bars on the conveyer belts at grocery store checkouts made me think, That's enough. I read Future Shock in the early '70s and said, Future shock will never happen to me. It has. At least in regard to advertising.
Intellitext pitched OSDN (now known as OSTG) (Score:5, Interesting)
Part of Intellitext's pitch was that plenty of "respected" news sites are doing this. My response: "Didn't your mother ever ask, 'If all the other kids were jumping off a cliff, would that mean you'd have to jump, too?'"
Fah.
- Robin 'Roblimo' Miller
Editor in Chief, OSTG
just add this to your hosts file... (Score:3, Informative)
and hey presto, they disappear!
or you could always install a much larger hosts [everythingisnt.com] file which takes care of quite a few nasties
How about just paying editors to run stories? (Score:4, Insightful)
And it is not illegal. But they do it.
Consequence:authorship of articles becomes unclear (Score:2)
Or IOW, ads become an editorial influence.
Credibility is dead. (Score:2)
People are only interested in viewpoints they agree with. They don't care about the credibility of the source. They don't want the truth, they want to believe they are right. Publications are only concerned with readership and the readers
DHTML ad links slow FireFox, compromise articles (Score:4, Interesting)
You are reading and article, and as you move your mouse around the article maybe following a line or something (I move my lips when I read -- leave me alone), you roll over these damned ad links. Sure enough, the scripting on the links creates a DHTML "pop-up" right where your mouse is, effectively BLOCKING the article you're trying to read.
Now, this sounds minorly annoying in an of itself -- you have to wait for the timeout before the ad will remove itself. But in addition to blocking text, the ad often has the unintended after effect of causing FireFox to lag. I've seen it on PCs ranging from my shitty 700MHz P3 at work to my 3400+ Athlon64 at home.
I am pretty certain that other websites have started using these sorts of sponsored links, and I really see it becoming as bad as traditional pop-ups or pop-unders. Even worse, I'm not immediately aware of any way to suppress them without turning off Javascript that supports DHTML. I'd be interested to know if AdBlock for FireFox will be able to adapt to these new advertising methods -- NOT because I don't want to see the ads -- I just don't want them to interrupt reading the articles.
I really think that these tech-savvy websites, although dependent on the ad revenue more so than their cheap ass readers (hey -- we buy all the shit they review -- we have no money), should reconsider using these sorts of links. Or at least review how they display in the context of trying to read a review or editorial on the latest and greatest hardware/software.
It's unfortunate, too, because you have to feel for these guys needing money to run their great websites, but at what cost to the integrity of their content?
IronChefMorimoto
I like ads, if they don't get in the way... (Score:3, Interesting)
popularity will fall (Score:2)
In the long run, this could actually do more harm than good. People will end up not clicking underlined words even when they are links to definitions, interesting factoids and so forth. Th
Ads disguised as articles are worse (Score:4, Insightful)
In my opinion, the worst offense are ads that are disguised as articles. The local major news paper is made up of at least 25% ads disguised as articles, which is part of the reason why I refuse to subscribe. This has not been as prevelant online as in print, but I expect that it will get that way as more of us switch to digital news.
Destruction of commons (Score:3, Insightful)
When more links are ads than something meaningful, surfers will learn to beware of them, which in turn is poison to hypertext, rendering it into 'just text'. We should not have to steer clear of links just in case they turn out to be ad-traps that slow down our surfing with pop-ups or pop-intos.
The infrastructure of Web is common property. Are the advertisers allowed to corrupt and destroy something that belongs to all of us?
What is wrong with ads really ? (Score:3, Insightful)
But what is wrong with text links and decent size banners ?
I am not talking about 100 banners on one page, just one on top, one on bottom and maybe some 125x60's inline
If you guys would realise please: the internet is not ruined by those who put ads on their pages; that keeps your content free...
the problem is SPAM advertisement, and the problem is search engine SPAMMING
As people will block decent website owners' normal ads, more and more people will turn to SPAM and blackhat SEO techniques
Since google denied to put pharmacy ads into adwords my get "X@N@X V|c0d|n cheap" SPAM vent up by about 600%, while my commissions from pharmacy advertisement went down by 50%
before there was decent advertising, now there is killer SE and MAIL SPAMMING
bottom line: KILL/BLOCK all ads and your mailbox will be doomed.....