A Modest Model Railroad 170
Endymion53 writes "The TMRC at MIT may be the best known model railroad layout because of its role in the formation of hacking culture, but railroad uber-enthusiast Jack Burgess has built himself a pretty enviable layout, that does its best to capture the look and route of an old rail line that went to Yosemite National park, called the Yosemite Valley railroad. I was tempted to make some crass remarks about having too much time on one's hands, but frankly, the whole thing looks just awesome. He's been working on this thing since 1981."
Just amazing (Score:5, Interesting)
Apart from the attention to detail, the actual functionality is absolutely astounding!
Re:Just amazing (Score:2, Informative)
Re:Just amazing (Score:2)
Bruce is the reigning king of computer control for Model Railroads.
Mr. Comductor (Score:5, Funny)
Re:Mr. Comductor (Score:1)
Re:Mr. Comductor (Score:2)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shining_Time_Station
Ringo Starr - Mr. Conductor (1990-1991)
George Carlin - Mr. Conductor (1991-1993)
~Z
Re:Mr. Comductor (Score:1)
Re:What's with this 'Mr. Conductor' nonse? (Score:2)
I watched it sunday mornings as a teenager because it was the only thin
The little website that could.... (Score:5, Funny)
CHooooo Chooooo!
I-serve-I-can I-serve-I-can I--serve--I--can I---serve---I---can
I------------serve----------
CHooooo Chooooo!
Slash-a-dot-a Slash-a-dot-a Slash-a-dot-a Slash-a-dot-a Slash-a-dot-a
Re:The little website that could.... (Score:4, Funny)
Re:The little website that could.... (Score:2)
And to a Slashbot, it's hysterical.
A True Historian (Score:5, Interesting)
I, for one, appreciate his work and would love to be able to visit his layout and enjoy it as I would any other historical museum.
Re:A True Historian (Score:1)
Re:A True Historian (Score:5, Informative)
Re:A True Historian (Score:5, Insightful)
Jack is *the* expert on the Yosemite Valley Railroad and has modeled it down to the smallest detail, including time-table operation for the scheduling of the trains based on what was actually running on the real railroad in August of 1939.
And his craftsmanship is outstanding.
Jack is an engineer and is very familiar with computers and has used CAD to design to construct his layout.
To put it another way, Jack is an ESR or Linus equivalent in the model railroad community.
Re:A True Historian (Score:3, Insightful)
If model railroading has a guru, it's John Allen of the Gorre & Daphetid.
Re:A True Historian (Score:2)
That would be Allen Mclelland or the late John Allen.
Jack would be one of the minor gods though.
Re:A True Historian (Score:2)
Ah. A gun nut. That is not that uncommon in the States, is it?
Channeling the god of sex. Hands up everyone who would channel the god of sex, if they could?
I think ESR's biggest contribution are the art
Re:A True Historian (Score:2)
One day, perhaps, I'll have the time to break out the old HO-scale train set and do something like that (or as near as I can manage).
Question for a rail enthusiast... (Score:5, Interesting)
I've seen a few layouts done that are supposed to recreate actual rail lines and I've always been puzzled by one thing. Given the geography of the room where someone sets up their layout and also the necesity of accessing the layout (if only to observe the fruits of all that hard work), I've always presumed such layouts are not attempts to faithfully duplicate the layout of the rail line but to represent the scenery through which a traveler would pass. That is, there's no attempt to duplicate or scale "Then this spur goes east for 24 miles before it turns north for three more..." just do something like "and after we pass through the pine forest here near the bedroom door, we hit the town of Pidegeonville, which I placed next to the window..."
A silly question, but wanted to make sure I understood the "ground rules" of these recreations.
Personally, I never got past an oval under the Christmas tree and trying to scare the cat, although I did work as a waiter on the Southwest Chief [amtrak.com] one summer in college. I don't think most modelmakers would care to recreate the Leavenworth prison or the vagrant we ran over near L.A. Union Station, though.
Re:Question for a rail enthusiast... (Score:5, Informative)
True. A 40 mile run in N-scale would be 1/4 mile of track. Most people don't have that much space. Nor do they want to spend the hour or so that it would take a train to travel that distance. Modelers use "selective compression" to show only the most interesting parts of the line, and a "fast clock" (typically 10x normal time) to get a full day's railroading done in an hour or two.
Re:Question for a rail enthusiast... (Score:5, Informative)
You are correct. There are actual scale model railroads (there's a museum in Chicago with a real scale model railroad of the Chicago area, for example - it's really impressive!), but they're rare. Most model railroaders attempt to model the "spirit" of a railroad, along with maybe some of its individually distinctive features, but they'll drastically shorten the "dead" areas of a railroad and/or combine the less distinctive features. The point is to capture the highlights of a railroad. Of course, many people don't bother modeling real railroads because they don't want to burden themselves with questions of accuracy - they just build whatever they think looks nice.
Same is actually true for the trains themselves. There's a segment of model railroaders who are derisively called "rivet counters" by the rest - these are people who are absolute sticklers for train model accuracy down to the last rivet. Most model railroaders, though, will accept some inaccuracies in their trains, and one of the main areas of inaccuracies is in the consists. Like layouts themselves, this is to save space - in HO scale, a typical passenger train made up of three or four locomotives and 17 or 18 85' cars could be 21-22 feet long! Most model railroaders do not run accurate trains; they run representations of them, featuring one or at the most two of every type of car in a passenger train, or simply shortened freight trains (many of which are just long and monotonous in real life anyway, IMO).
Of course, choosing a smaller scale will let you model more in the same space, but sometimes in less detail. In the US, HO scale is most popular because it still generally offers the best balance between detail level and space savings (vs. the original O scale). In Japan, N scale is the most popular because of the small size of many dwellings there - and I also think because Japanese model railroading is more fixed-consist passenger-oriented (vs. mixed freight here), so to model a train that looks remotely realistic you have to run fairly long trains. N scale has also improved dramatically in detail level over the past 20 or so years, so I expect if this hobby survives there will be a gradual increase in the popularity of N scale in this country, leading to somewhat more realistically-sized layouts.
It's a hobby still in slow decline in the US, though, going hand in hand with the decline of passenger trains in general (and the rise of other pastimes such as video and computer games - kids who in generations past would grow up with train sets are now growing up with PlayStations instead). Which is a shame - many of these layouts really are true historical documents, in the same way any museum diorama is. And they're fun, too!
Re:Question for a rail enthusiast... (Score:3, Informative)
The musuem also has a complete locomotive on display. If your ever in the area it's definitly worth seeing.
Re:Question for a rail enthusiast... (Score:2)
Thanks for the suggestion. Here is the actual link [msichicago.org]. (You had a spelling error in your link.)
Model Railroading (Score:5, Informative)
It's been awhile since I was a subscriber to Model Railroader (50 bucks a year for a student is steep), but in the early nineties it seemed like the convergence of computers and model railroading was finally beginning to happen so that people who weren't in MIT and were still interested in controlling trains with computers could begin to tinker.
Course, the ultimate limitation on model railroading seems to always be space, so I'm hoping that when I have some space in the future I'll be able to get a layout going again, and even have fun working on the computer aspect.
Re:Model Railroading (Score:4, Insightful)
His college training was in art, and he made some good investments which left him financially independent at a young age. Both of those help. Those and a sense of humor.
Re:Model Railroading (Score:2, Interesting)
Re:Model Railroading (Score:2)
He's also really famous for the switching game
Re:Model Railroading (Score:2)
I remember feeling a bit cheated to read of John's death and the loss ten days later of the G&D. That's 31 years ago.
Another memory was watching Warren Beatty in "Dick Tracy" - the nightime scenes by the docks looked just Like one of John Allen's simulated nightime shots of Port City (well at least the color and mood).
Wonder how many of the young'uns on Slashdot would know how to pronounce Gorre & Daphetid.
Re:Model Railroading (Score:1)
Not bad, but... (Score:5, Interesting)
Re:Not bad, but... (Score:5, Informative)
Re:Not bad, but... (Score:1)
Re:Not bad, but... (Score:2)
Re:Not bad, but... (Score:2)
Re:Not bad, but... (Score:2)
Hey, what would Hamburg be without the red light district?
Re:Not bad, but... (Score:2)
Re:Not bad, but... (Score:1)
Maerklin is the way to go! (Score:3, Informative)
The above system in Hamburg looks like the Maerklin trains. They have a digital control system where by you don't have to have any blocks to control your trains. You put out full voltage onto the rails at all times and then the engines know what direction they should go and how fast to go. It is a much better system and more realistically approximates the way real trains work.
I believe that you can even control the switches with this system.
In reading through the MIT page, I wa
Forgot to put the URL in a tag (Score:2)
Re:Maerklin is the way to go! (Score:5, Informative)
Or as we call them in the US, "Marklin" trains
Not sure which is more technically correct - it's an "a" with an umlaut over it, which is just too hard to type on an English keyboard/OS!
They have a digital control system where by you don't have to have any blocks to control your trains. You put out full voltage onto the rails at all times and then the engines know what direction they should go and how fast to go. It is a much better system and more realistically approximates the way real trains work.
Marklin has no copyright or trademark on this. It's called Digital Command Control and it's what most model railroaders the world over use today. See here [dcc.info]. Nearly all current model locomotives made and/or marketed in the US (and Europe and Japan, for that matter) are now DCC-ready.
btw, Marklin trains are some high-quality trains, alright (my brother deals almost exclusively with them)... but so are a lot of other makes. There's always somewhat of a debate on who makes the best equipment, but I think most model railroaders agree that it really depends these days on the specific car/locomotive being modeled - one company may make a better looking and running ICE, another may make a better looking and running SD40-2, another may make a better looking and running Hudson J2E. All of the major manufacturers in HO and N (Kato, Tomix, Walthers, Atlas, Marklin, etc.) maintain at least a basic standard of quality - they're all at least good, all the time.
Oh, and if you're wondering, metal is not better than plastic! At least not as a rule. It's nearly impossible to get the same level of precision and detail in die-cast as in plastic, and while brass is still fairly popular, it's also extremely expensive and extremely fragile (relegating brass trains mainly to display duty these days - nobody wants to derail a $5,000 train and see it go tumbling to the floor, pieces breaking off all the way down!).
Re:Maerklin is the way to go! (Score:2)
Not sure which is more technically correct - it's an "a" with an umlaut over it, which is just too hard to type on an English keyboard/OS!
Well, the "official" way (in Germany/Austria/Switzerland at least) to transcribe umlauts(?) if you don't want/can't use them is to replace them with the normal letter + 'e'. So 'Marklin'(with umlaut) would become 'Maerklin' as you can see by their websites www.maerklin.de [maerklin.de] and www.maerklin.com [maerklin.com]. OK, I just realized that
Re:Maerklin is the way to go! (Score:3, Informative)
They implement the DCC system, which was first developed by Lenz in Germany and then made an official standard by the NMRA [nmra.org]. They do make very high quality and expensive equipment. But my opinion of Marklin is marred by my memory of my childhood Marklin AC train set with the center pickup. I just never really cared for either the unrealistic center pickup, or the equally unrealistic jerk when reversing direction. I know their DCC systems won't have either issues, but old preju
Re:Not bad, but... (Score:2)
It's true in that it is truly a wonderland, the size of place and the attention to details were remarkable, I had never imagined such a thing could exist until I saw it.
Re:Not bad, but... (Score:2)
It does seem very large, though not necessarily the model train part [madurodam.nl].
> Though I've also been to Hamburg I don't remember this.
The Hamburg layout was only opened to the public in 2001.
1981! (Score:2, Insightful)
Re:1981! (Score:1)
Re:1981! (Score:2, Insightful)
HO, baby! (Score:4, Funny)
Re:HO, baby! (Score:1)
Re:HO, baby! (Score:2)
Local Model Railroad Clubs (Score:5, Interesting)
One such local group is the Twin Cities Model Railroad Museum [tcmrm.org] which has a pretty nice layout [tcmrm.org] itself.
Re:Local Model Railroad Clubs (Score:2)
Re:Local Model Railroad Clubs (Score:3, Interesting)
Re:Local Model Railroad Clubs (Score:1)
Is that real railroading or pretend railroading?
Re:Local Model Railroad Clubs (Score:2, Informative)
the National Model Railroad Association [nmra.org]. You can find everything you might want to know at the site.
Hobby Stuff (Score:3, Interesting)
I like hobby stuff and I've hosted the rebuilding story of a real steam car at http://stanleysteamer.pipingdesign.com for the past couple of years. Check it out if you like rebuilding originals.
I Don't even know where to start with this one... (Score:4, Funny)
All kidding aside, it's just a great setup.
Pretty Cool. Reminds me of when I was a kid. (Score:4, Interesting)
I used to be a member of a model railroad club in Holly, Michigan. It was in an old movie theater and the layout covered ALL the floorspace. There was a balcony where the movie screen used to be and that's where we controlled the engine by wireless and kept the dispatch busy by updating them with our engine locations.
It was a first-class layout there. Anybody else in Michigan ever visit the Detroit model railroad club in Holly?
Re:Pretty Cool. Reminds me of when I was a kid. (Score:4, Informative)
Detroit Model Railroad Club. . . . . . . Scale: O
104 N. Saginaw
Holly, MI 48442-1405
248/634-5811
The Detroit Model Railroad Club was founded in January, 1935 as an off-shoot of The Detroit Society of Model Engineers. The Detroit Union Railroad is the basis for our freelance theme with connections with the various railroads which served the Detroit area in 1957. The narrow gage will depict eastern type narrow gage. We have 35 active members and a number of associate members. Calling the old Holly theater our home, we feel that being in an old theater creates a unique atmosphere for model railroading. Being the largest model railroad in the State of Michigan brings people in from many areas.
Meetings: Tuesday nights from 7PM to 10PM to work on the layout and have Open Houses for the public on certain weekends. We have about 40 active and 60 associate members and new members are welcome.
Here a list [tfs.net] of model railroad clubs in Michigan.
+1 funny (Score:2)
Overcoming obstacles (Score:1, Funny)
Re:Overcoming obstacles (Score:2, Interesting)
Stop motion films... (Score:4, Interesting)
Re:Stop motion films... (Score:2)
"Now arriving on platform 1 is the 10:45 from Yosemite."
"Ready to depart on platform 3 is the 12:05 to Kirkwood".
"The AT-AT from Hoth is currently boarding on platform 7."
Original American Geeks (Score:5, Insightful)
Railroaders were the technical cutting edge of the 19th century. Financial over-investments in transportation (both canals and rail) contributed to the 1837 Panic. Gee, times have changed (heh!).
Yeah, I play Loki's RT2 Linux port. But I'm not knowledgable enough about the real thing to be a credible rail fan.
Re:Original American Geeks (Score:2)
Also consider that from around 1900-1930 1 in 5 Americans worked directly for the railroads. No othe
Re:Original American Geeks (Score:2)
Not just American. My first interest when I was very very young was model railways. It's that that taught me electrics, electronics and logic. From there I moved on to electronics as a hobby and then from there to computers starting with the ubiquitous TRaSh-80 and following it up with the Be
Re:Original American Geeks (Score:2)
People care about rail in PA, but they'd rather have a Rails-to-Trails project so the hordes can mountain bike.
Very few rail lovers left. Shoot me a URL if you know of people interested in saving SE PA heritage.
Re:Original American Geeks (Score:2)
How does it comapre? Rail: talk to new people and make friends; might be 10 minutes late. Car: isolated experience and sometimes people try to wreck with my piddly $25 grand rolling investment.
Interesting (Score:5, Insightful)
Does this not perfectly describe the difference between "producer" and "consumer?"
Would that we, as a society, could find a way to encourage people to value productive, thinking time. Such people produce literature, invention and wisdom.
Re:Interesting (Score:4, Insightful)
Issac Asimov has the right to tell me to "get a life." But someone whose seen every episode of Law and Order does not.
Poor guy (Score:5, Interesting)
[Emphasis mine]
And I mean, it's *right there* when you read the page. Couldn't you at least set up a Paypal account or something so that people who visit the site can kick a pity dollar for smalltime, image-heavy, hobbyist sites like this?
Did the guy get a warning, at least? Since the site hasn't buckled, I'm assuming he's bursting his metered bandwidth as I type, and paying an awful lot for the privilege.
Slashdot should at least buy one of his books.
leem
p.s. Totally amazing dedication that this guy has put into the hobby.
Re:Poor guy (Score:2, Informative)
Additional Data Transfer (Billed Automatically) $ 0.10 / MB / month
(the plans look like they start with 7-10GB/mo)
That can't be good if he goes over. That price is a total ripoff imho.
Re:Poor guy (Score:3, Interesting)
Unfortunately that appears to be the case. This morning I received a frustrated reply from Mr Burgess to a short complimentary email I sent last night. Quoting:
This is not good, guys. Not good at all.
Granted, we know that bandwidth can be thr
Re:Poor guy (Score:2)
Large-scale railroads (Score:1)
Another train layout (shameless plug) (Score:3, Interesting)
I built some of the buildings.
Lots of pictures.
Re:Another train layout (shameless plug) (Score:2)
Oh dear. Even this little comment-slashdotting brought it down.
Sure-fire way to get me to clean my basement (Score:2)
Gotta get off this computer and actually do something for once, y'know!
Beautiful! (Score:4, Insightful)
The Phones (Score:1)
Re:The Phones (Score:1)
As model railroaders go... (Score:4, Informative)
Just like Gomez..... (Score:2, Funny)
Model Railroading has become high-tech (Score:2, Interesting)
Anyone remember the book YV88? (Score:2)
One reason for bringing it up is that the book described a computer network running over fiber-optic lines and a displaying several peo
Strange... (Score:3, Interesting)
I am actually part of a business that manufactures kits for model railroads. Right now we mostly make LargeScale which is for outdoor gardens... We use to do HO scale, and plan on going back into it soon.
I have actually met the man who made the railroad posted, very dedicated, and great model railroader.
Anyways, was just surprised to see something like this... Posted here...
If you want to check out some largescale models you can check out our site at www.railroadavenue.com
Just recently changed our host server (a couple days ago) so if you find any missing or screwed links, e-mail me if you could... I checked them all and it all worked, but you never know.
P.S. You'd be suprised to see how many techies are in this hobby. I have met more than one rocket scientist, tons of engineers (the kind who design things), and a bunch of other "geeks".
This is slashdotting? (Score:3, Funny)
Outgoing rates: 7329.4 kbits/sec 621.8 packets/sec
for /.ers new to the hobby... (Score:4, Informative)
Some stuff I've been drooling over lately:
West-Side Locomotive Works [att.net]
garden railroading images like this one [g-scale-society.co.uk]
and of course my favorite model train company, Lehmann Gross Bahn [www.lgb.de]
Enjoy, and add your own links!
Must resist (Score:2)
Probably why I never got too far in Sim City games either.
Roadside America (Score:4, Informative)
Wholesome tourist attraction for kids and adults - you'll love it. Usual disclaimer applies.
Charlemange's Castle (Score:2)
The trains are only part of the setup, and run automatically.
I went there on a slow day and mentioned that I was interested in model railroading.
The owner took me in back and showed me the control room.
It was pretty impressive.
Helen, Georgia (Score:2)
Did he use an Itanium 2? (Score:2)
Links links links (Score:2)
Dr. Bruce Chubb has a series running in Model Railroader (Starting Jan 2004 issue) to use input/output cards to run signals, turnouts, just about everything on a model railroad. Thing is, it's useful for any computer controled need. You can find the circuit cards here: Serial cards [jlcenterprises.net]
If model Live Steam is your thing, check out these photos here [livesteaming.com]
If you have a spare USD $800,000.00, you can buy a real, running steam locomotive [ozarkmountainrailcar.com].
Or if you
Re:didnt read the article (Score:3, Insightful)
Come on, use some logic. You don't have enough information with only the year the project was started to make a comment in the vein that you want to.
Re:didnt read the article (Score:3, Insightful)
Or maybe he didn't have enough free time for years which is why he's been working on it for nearly a quarter of a century. Okay, model railroading isn't my personal hobby. But I spend enough time pursuing hobby interests to respect someone's ability to go beyond just puttering and create something on an impressive scale. Having too much free time on your hands often has dramatically different results [darwinawards.com].
Re:didnt read the article (Score:4, Funny)
Oh, does he? He could probably waste that time by sitting on slashdot and posting assinine comments like yours.
It's only 20' x 20' (Score:2)