Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

News for nerds, stuff that matters

Slashdot Log In

Log In

Create Account  |  Retrieve Password

Lego to Stop Producing Mindstorms

Posted by CowboyNeal on Sat Jan 10, 2004 10:37 AM
from the good-thing-not-always-popular dept.
nick58b writes "Lego, in response to the worst financial loss in its history, has announced they will stop making the electronics and movie tie-in products. This would include Mindstorms, one of the greatest educational toys ever produced." It saddens me greatly to see the toy that was such a mainstay of my childhood to be in such dire financial straits. If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.
+ -
story

Related Stories

[+] Hardware: Fan-Designed Mindstorms Release Next Tuesday 73 comments
EaglesNest writes "The Washington Post has a story describing Lego's new Mindstorms. Two years ago, Lego formed their own 'star chamber' to decide what the next iteration of Mindstorms would look like. Eventually reaching 14 people, the Mindstorm users panel had a huge impact on what will be released commercially next week." From the article: "One member was even able to pressure the company into building a part that makes its debut in the new Mindstorms set -- a rare event at Lego, which treats every individual piece with reverence. The new part is a connector that allows two long pieces to be joined at a 90-degree angle. The resulting toy has much more up-to-date technology than the original set, including a USB 2.0 port for fast downloads and Bluetooth for wireless connections. With the right parts and programming, a Mindstorms robot can dance in response to sounds or follow the beam of a flashlight."
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
 Full
 Abbreviated
 Hidden
More
Loading... please wait.
  • I've been a Lego fan most of my life too, but I have to say that I'm not surprised or terribly upset about the way this has turned out. Lego sets have become so ungodly expensive over the years (many $100+ sets having nothing to offer for their high price points other than "collector's series" or some other buzzword), it's no wonder more people aren't buying them.
    • Too Specialized (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Oculus Habent (562837) * <oculus@habent.gmail@com> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:47AM (#7937546) Journal
      I've kept my eye on Lego, even though I haven't purchased much for years. My greatest disappointment is the "special" pieces that are now so common. All the special pieces detract from your ability to make new and interesting things with multiple sets.

      It's time to go back to castles and space ships and cities.
  • Don't forget... (Score:5, Interesting)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:41AM (#7937502)
    The plural of Lego is Lego, not Legos.


    Plus Lego is Danish for "play well"


    Just a few Lego facts.

  • by smooge (3938) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:41AM (#7937503) Homepage
    I would say that it might send a message if you buy as direct as possible from them.. but I would make sure that they are all bought up by the end of the month. Even if Lego cant keep the product.. it might inspire some other company to do so.
  • Great stuff, but... (Score:4, Informative)

    by BillFarber (641417) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:42AM (#7937513)
    they charge twice as much for the same stuff you can get from other brands. Of course, the high value of the Euro isn't helping. Those are the reasons why the company is having financial problems.
  • by jolyonr (560227) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:43AM (#7937514) Homepage
    Too many of the new lego products have so few generic bricks and too many specialist bricks that can't easily be used for other things, eg, you can build a lego buggy into, um, a slightly different buggy, but not a lot else.

    Get back to providing big bags of ordinary bricks, and encourage creativity!

    Jolyon
    • by Anonymous Coward on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:01AM (#7937628)
      The real problem Lego is facing right now (let's hope they realize it) is they produce too much custom pieces. Every set has at least 5 - 10 custom bricks and therefore:
      1) costs much to produce
      2) contains less ordinary pieces to reduce the costs
      3) Since it contains less pieces and the ones it contains are custom, there's very little play value to justify the cost.

      I would suggest Lego to:
      1)reduce custom pieces. Kids are suppose to have fantasy you know... I remember I put two triangles together and pretend it was a star destroyer...
      2)kill most of the cinema stuff. Starwars stuff is ok (meaning it's well done and designed). reduce cutom pieces and completely kill the other series ( If they can't make other movies with the same quality, then it's a no go.)
      3)Kill bionicles!!!! (what in the world are those things? are they LEGO at all? and they DO contain very few pieces and they're mostly custom!!!! They're model kits, not LEGO!)
      4) where are the old series? trains castles cities... there was really tons and tons of stuff!!! (and some amazing works to say the truth) where's all that stuff gone?

      Anyway, probably Lego is facing the usual toy VS digital dilemma where most of the kids don't want dull toys and prefer videgames... anyway, I really believe the company isn't facing the crisis for the good... A few steps in the same direction and Lego is gone.
    • by pcraven (191172) <paul&cravenfamily,com> on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:11AM (#7937672) Homepage
      If you want just plain bricks, they sell them [lego.com]. And those sets aren't that expensive.
  • Such a shame :-( (Score:4, Insightful)

    by tuxette (731067) * <tuxette@NospAm.gmail.com> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:45AM (#7937528) Homepage Journal
    This is horrible. I was hoping to buy my nephew lots of Mindstorms [lego.com] stuff when he got older. Maybe I have to buy them now and keep them around?

    I'm not sure the price of these toys is the problem. Toys in general aren't exactly cheap these days. Neither are video games, and video games seem to be what is the most appealing to children these days. So what we might need to look into is why expensive video games are more interesting than expensive toys where children have to actually think to use them. Or did I just answer my own question?

  • by cflorio (604840) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:46AM (#7937532) Homepage
    Maybe they wouldn't loose so much Money if they didn't pay people to play with Legos! [slashdot.org]

    At the very least, they could outsource the playing with Legos to India!

  • specialization (Score:5, Insightful)

    by frizz (91565) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:48AM (#7937555)
    The problem with Lego sets in recent years has been the fact that they are very specialized. You used to be able to buy sets that allowed for lots of imagination, such as "pirate", "city", and "space" legos. Now, all I see is "Star Wars: Episode I" or other such sets that don't inspire the imagination in the slightest.
    • by NineNine (235196) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:24AM (#7937738) Homepage
      You used to be able to buy sets that allowed for lots of imagination, such as "pirate", "city", and "space" legos.

      When I was a kid, I bought Lego sets that just came with x number of assorted blocks with no theme whatsoever. That took REAL creativity. I don't even know if you can buy just plain ol' regular blocks anymore.
  • No wonder (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Apreche (239272) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:56AM (#7937605) Homepage Journal
    It's no wonder that lego is losing money. They seem to be putting a heck of a lot of their resources into stuff like Bionicle. Have you seen those things? There are like 10 pieces, they are not standard brick, and you can only make one thing out of them.

    Bring back castle lego at a reasonable price and we'll talk. I would love to get my hands on that original black knight's castle. The big black square one. Now all they make is bionicle, harry potter, and some star wars. It's not the same as it was.

    It used to be a toy of building. Now it's just a toy you build.
  • Too specialized (Score:5, Interesting)

    by localroger (258128) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:57AM (#7937609) Homepage
    I have to cast my lot with the folks who are complaining about too many special-purpose blocks. Lego has to make molds for all of those, no wonder the damn things are so expensive.

    When I was a kid, there were very few specialized blocks. Even the railroad kit didn't have any except for the lego motor modules (I have always had a soft heart for the 70's-era motor modules) and the railroad tracks. Even the railroad track ties were standard 8x2 thin blocks.

    In those days the vast majority of legos were sold in generic kits. You could even get small boxes of 50 or 100 generic blocks, up through the large 400 and 600 and 1000 block kits. All generic. They'd come with a little booklet of suggestions but the possibilities were endless.

    The 70's-era house kits had doors, windows, and roof blocks all of which tied in with standard blocks. You could build a wall of doors or use an architectural door in your Moon Rover. You could use your roof blocks to make an Aztec pyramid.

    Now you buy a little kit for, say, a TIE fighter and it costs $20 and there's not much you can build with it except things that look a hell of a lot like TIE fighters. The big generic kits aren't even sold any more; if they were they'd probably cost $1,000 and nobody would buy them.

    Lego should go back to making the generic kits, price them reasonably, and let the kids think of stuff to build themselves again.

  • showing their age (Score:5, Interesting)

    by tobes (302057) * <[moc.cam] [ta] [allidapybot]> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:58AM (#7937615) Homepage
    I think that it was time to retire the current incarnation of Mindstorms anyway. It would be nice if the next gen. robot toy featured:
    wireless (802.11x or cell)
    a linux based os (of course)
    more sophisticated moving parts
    cooler ai modules...

    I definitely think that there is a market out there for such a product.
  • Play methods (Score:5, Insightful)

    by Waffle Iron (339739) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:03AM (#7937634)
    If I were a more qualified sociologist, I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

    I don't know about 20 years ago, but 35 years ago I used to play with plain rectangular Lego blocks and generic wheels. I had to use my own mind and imagination to assemble these general-purpose blocks into the wide variety of things I wanted to build.

    From the look of today's Lego sets, children play today by using the custom single-purpose pieces to assemble a verbatim copy of the picture on the box.

  • by snookerdoodle (123851) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:04AM (#7937639) Homepage
    As the father of 7 and 8 year old boys, the elder of which has quite a collection of Bionicles, I've observed one little tidbit about Lego: if you lose or break a piece, it's gonna cost you an arm and a leg to replace it (No Bionicle Pun Intended ;).

    What does this have to do with their financial success? A lot, IMHO. It certainly has affected our brand loyalty. As Kewl as Bionicles are, we have tried to steer our boyz towards products made by more consumer friendly companies, such as K'nex.

    I know there's more to running a company, but this to me says they still Just Don't Get It.

    Mark
  • by tjcoyle (539228) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:11AM (#7937666) Homepage

    Am I the only one who has noticed that Lego barely sells a kit (in stores) that require any effort or concentration to complete?

    When I was younger (here we go....), toy stores always had a great selection of the classic Technics kits. The large, complicated kits seemed to be the hottest items, because they were *challenging* and *interesting*.

    Today, most of the sets I see are low-piece count, over-simplifed, plug-the-head-into-the-pelvic-chassis Bionicle garbage, which seems only to make the statement that kids today aren't interested in anything unless it's presented as a completely non-cerebral AARRRGGGHHH-type of monster package.

    This really is a shame. I'll never stop appreciating the endless hours I spent creating machines of every type imaginable, and can't help but to think that my exposure to Lego helped to form a little bit of who I am today.

    I don't know what a childhood of building Bionicles might do to kid, expect possibly make them wish their parents were cool enough to buy them a toy that doesn't require assembly, like the kid next door.

    And that's a sad thing

  • 3 things (Score:5, Interesting)

    by teamhasnoi (554944) <teamhasnoi@@@yahoo...com> on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:42AM (#7937830) Homepage Journal
    That have prevented me from buying Legos:

    1. Price - wow. Am I stunned when I see legos in the store now. Multiple hundreds of dollars. The most expensive kit I owned as a kid was 60 bucks for the lastest and bestest. Which leads me to...

    2. The kits themselves. I got Technics as a kid and made *everything* with them. The manuals were thick, had many different things you could make with them. Now - the kits are one project. There's no imagination to them. My 60 dollar kit was a red dump truck. It had the frame of a windshield - imagination filled in the rest. Now the windshield comes with the set. Who needs to stretch their thinking? I liked it when *I* made the choice of what the pieces were for.

    3. Bionicles. Ironically, that brought legos to my attention (free toy at Burger World), but when I investigated, it was lousy. Hey look, I put this part here and *nowhere* else. Isn't the reason behind legos being able to place a piece wherever you want it? Gahh.

    Put all these together, and what do you have? Someone who would like to buy legos, but the kits I want aren't around. I'd love to use legos in a more industrial manner (say building a case for something) but the basic sets are few and far between.

    Three things that keep me from busting out my legos:

    1. Cats.

    2. Cat hair. (I can just imagine it sticking out of the seams and it makes me freak :)

    3. Not enough room/time to mess with them. House is too small after the holidays and time is always short. Not like the halcyon days of my youth.

    LEGO! Go back to the basics! Give us the old Technic sets, the massive 'generic' kits. Fire the Bionicle guy. You are digging your own grave. The more specialized you make your toys, the more people will just buy toys that are already 'done'. And that was never the point in the first place.

    BTW - No. I won't sell any of my extensive collection of Technics or my wonderful zillion piece basic set. If ever there was something to be buried with, its my legos. You can try and pry them out of my cold, dead hands, but look out for the transforming watchdog I just made. His mouth moves and he's looking at you.

  • The death of Lego? (Score:5, Insightful)

    by kekoap (37035) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:00PM (#7937924)

    The article confirms that Lego has been hurting badly. The writing has been on the wall for a while now though. Just look at Lego's product lines over the past 5-10 years. Added: Harry Potter, Star Wars, video games, Bionicle, Sports, Mindstorms. Lost: classic space, castle, pirates. Plus the saddest thing for me, a lack of focus on good Technic sets.

    Why so many problems? I think kids expect more from today's toys than just bricks. That's kind of a sad fact that says something about our culture I think. Second, since the expiration of Lego's stud-and-tube patent, there's been competition from Mega Bloks, which are inferior but cheaper. In today's world though, I think it makes sense that many parents choose cheaper rather than better. Another sad fact.

    In any event, while I'm unhappy about Mindstorms, I'm happy they're abandoning Harry Potter and the like. They have totally lost their identity by branching out, and I think they really do need to get back to their core business as they're doing now. I wonder though, is it too late already?

    There use to be a steady stream of great Technic sets worth getting, but recently good sets have slowed to a trickle, with just one catching my eye recently... 8455 Backhoe [lego.com]. Check it out, it might be one of your last few chances to grab a great Lego set.

  • by skippy1 (78646) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:01PM (#7937931)
    Check this out: http://www.lego.com/eng/info/default.asp?page=pres s See the Jan 8 post. Nothing there about Mindstorms being cancelled. I just read something on LugNet as well that was an interview at one of the Lego shows, and one of the Lego reps said that Mindstorms 3 was in development. Here's hoping!
    • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Insightful)

      by Oculus Habent (562837) * <oculus@habent.gmail@com> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:44AM (#7937520) Journal
      Price.

      Also, how many parent think, "Little Jimmy should have a programmable set of Lego!"

      TC Logo and Dacta were also great toys (one of my teachers wrote some of the documentation), but there just wasn't a big market.
      • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Interesting)

        by A55M0NKEY (554964) on Saturday January 10 2004, @01:20PM (#7938406) Homepage Journal
        Yes. Price. Legos are really cool, but they have always been way overpriced. They are lil' plastic blocks. They should be like 10 bucks for a five gallon pail of them, not 40 bucks for three handfuls.
            • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Informative)

              by lahi (316099) on Saturday January 10 2004, @05:54PM (#7940555)
              If this was a chinese company they'd sell 5lb buckets of assorted pieces for $5.

              And each brick would have a lifetime of less than one year, developing cracks and warp. Of the 5 lb, at least 4 lb would be out-of-spec, either fit too loosely or too tight, and they would have sharp, annoying warts where they were carelessly ripped from the molding sprue. The color would vary extremely from batch to batch, be rather dull, and fade rapidly when exposed to the sun.

              The problem with LEGO bricks is not that they are overpriced, but that they are overengineered. They are just too good. And quality is just not generally appreciated these days, especially when we're talking toys.

              As a child, I had quite a few Matchbox, Corgi and Dinky cars, very accurate models, well made, often in England. Sure, you can still get those brands today, if you want to pay collector prices. The toy stores, at least here, abound with lousy chinese produced stuff, that breaks when you look too hard at it.

              Mind you, many of my toys I had inherited from my older brothers. And many of my toys are still in such a good shape, that my son now continues to play with them. That's good for the customer, but it's just not good for sales: either kids inherit a toy (= no sale) or parents don't care about long life, and therefore buy cheaper toys.

              I build plastic models (aircraft, military vehicles etc), and I can tell you that precisely molded plastic parts, even when they come in just one color and still attached to the sprue, as plastic model kits do, are *quite* expensive. *Even* when produced in China.

              -Lasse
      • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Insightful)

        by zaffir (546764) on Saturday January 10 2004, @01:54PM (#7938664)
        Also, there are no good, cool sets to buy anymore. It's all Bionicle or sets that are 90% "unique" pieces. Every time i go to the toy store i hope to find something along the lines of Space Police or Ice Station or any of the other good sets, and they just don't exist. Therefore, Lego doesn't get my money.
    • by luge (4808) <slashdotNO@SPAMtieguy.org> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:46AM (#7937536) Homepage
      The mindstorms were cool toys, for a little while. But Lego never upgraded them- realistically, they had not released a significant upgrade of any type in the now 6 years since they released the product. They could have made them either more powerful (and hence more appealing to the adults who bought tons of them early on, but got frustrated by HW limitations quickly) or they could have made them simpler (and hence more appealing to the kids who they normally try to target.) They did neither, and let the product stagnate. And that's why they have to kill it now. Shame, really- they could have been really, really great. [I used to maintain legOS, so I fall into the category of 'adults frustrated by the limitations.]
      • Me too... (Score:4, Interesting)

        by OmniGeek (72743) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:35AM (#7937791)
        Alas, I also got frustrated with the hardware limitations. There's only so much one can do with three sensor/actuator channels, and I was never able to come up with a decent method of I/O expansion. An I/O expansion unit or expansion connector would have made more I/O's possible, vastly expanding the RCX's capabilities and potential market (the geeks with $ and their kids). Processor power was certainly not the limiting factor on the RCX.

        That said, NQC and LegOS really rock. Many thanks to you who developed and maintained them!
    • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Informative)

      by Drakin (415182) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:54AM (#7937591)
      Not low sales. Low profit margins. They're cutting the electronic, and licensed sets primarly. Which are the more expensive ones to make, electronic ones due to the cost of componates, and licensed sets for the costs of licensing.

      One could only wish that they would license out the mindstorm excluseive items to be built and sold by someone else.
    • Vid Games (Score:5, Insightful)

      by millahtime (710421) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:13AM (#7937678) Homepage Journal
      Could the less use of legos be due to video games???? I think so. Why use your imaginagtion when someone else can do it for you.
      • Re:What happened? (Score:4, Interesting)

        by RealityMogul (663835) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:34AM (#7937788)
        I got my son a couple lego sets for Christmas and one of the Mega Block sets. The Mega Block set was a pain in the ass to assemble and all the pieces just kept popping apart. I think there is still an issue with quality even though the pieces look the same.

        Of course one of the Lego sets was missing several pieces, so they aren't without their problems.
          • Re:What happened? (Score:5, Insightful)

            by fenix down (206580) on Saturday January 10 2004, @02:32PM (#7938911)
            Honestly, I don't see how that's a bad thing. I always thought the Star Wars sets were a bad idea, no matter how neat it is to have a little Lego Emperor. You get the kid a model kit if he wants a model Millenium Falcon. Lego's for building stuff without instructions. Sure, sell the sets, it keeps the kids busy for the rest of Christmas day, but at least pretend you can take it apart and turn it into something else. What's your kid supposed to do when he takes the thing apart the next day and all he has are irregular slanty bricks with Rebel Alliance logos printed on them and Millenium Falcon hull sections? You can't very well go and build castle turrets out of R2D2's head.
    • by BoldAC (735721) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:50AM (#7937566)
      It is not SCO's fault.

      Since it reported its first loss of $47.8 million in 1998, Lego has been hit hard by increasing competition from the makers of electronic toys.

      It is GBA fault. It is the fault of the game consoles, the computers, and the leap-pad-ish products.

      Plastic legos and tinker-toys and cabin logs rocked when I was a child. This year Christmas for my two year old required more batteries than gifts for the rest of my family.

      Pure electronic gifts are winning...

      All of our kids are going to grow to be bigger geeks than we are. :)

      AC
      • by DAldredge (2353) <SlashdotEmail@GMail.Com> on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:54AM (#7937596) Journal
        No.

        Geeks can think and imagine. You are turning you 2 year old into a person that has to have flashly lights to be entertained.
      • by GreyWolf3000 (468618) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:40AM (#7937815) Journal
        No, lego has gotten into the business of dumbing down their products by making huge specialized pieces and now real lego enthusiasts are buying both themselves and their children bulk used sets off of ebay.
        • by wayward_son (146338) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:20PM (#7938029)
          Exactly.

          In the heyday of Lego, (late 1980's-early 1990's IMHO) you had a few specialized parts and mostly rather generic parts. You could build many different things out of a kit, sometimes even coming up with things better that what the kit was intended for. For example, I was able to build a church for my Lego town out of leftover castle parts.

          Now it's all specialized crap. You can only build one thing that looks halfway decent. What's the fun in that?

        • by Blondie-Wan (559212) on Saturday January 10 2004, @12:37PM (#7938111) Homepage
          But they also make general parts assortments. In some ways, one can find more "open," "nonspecialized" LEGO now than back in the '70s. You can directly order bags of just one kind of basic brick from them, for example, and many of the LEGO stores have bins of parts so one can just fill a cup or a bag with parts, as in a candy store.

          Tellingly, the Make and Create sets are apparently a bright spot for the company; reportedly they're among the few things they do really well, which seems to indicate their customers do indeed want general, nonspecialized sets that encourage imaginative, free-form building and unguided play as much as possible (though I do know one of the Harry Potter sets was apparently their biggest seller last year, but I guess that's an aberration). If nothing else, those sets also have some of the better price/piece ratios among all their current offerings...

    • by homer_ca (144738) on Saturday January 10 2004, @02:58PM (#7939128)
      Very sad, to lose Mindstorms, although I never tried it myself. However, one maker of similar toys is Fischertechnik [fischertechnik.com]. They come from Germany, and they don't have much distribution here, but I had a set as a kid, and it's the absolute best quality I've seen for any mechanical tinkering. Imagine the best of Legos and Erector sets combined.

      I've never tried their robotics kits, but it may be just what you're looking for. Eight digital inputs, two analog inputs, and four motor outputs. Also the quality of the gears, motors and structural pieces blows Legos away. Price is expensive, but not outrageously so. In the same ballpark as Mindstorms.
    • No (Score:4, Insightful)

      by imsabbel (611519) on Saturday January 10 2004, @10:56AM (#7937604)
      Sorry, but for 100$ you get a a64 3000+. You know, 1024KiB high speed cache, 6.4GB/s HT io, ect.
      Those little microcontrollers cost you 5$ at most if you buy a few 1000.
    • Re:MindStorms (Score:5, Insightful)

      by alienw (585907) <alienw.slashdot@ ... inus threevowels> on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:17AM (#7937695)
      Add that to the cost of making the plastic blocks themselves.

      Nope. Plastic blocks cannot cost much more than a few cents. It's simple injection molding, the same way they make CDs. Not much material in each block. The only reason lego charges such outrageous prices for them is because they can.

      I mean, a microcontroller with three inputs and outputs, 32 kB RAM, and some ROM (512 kiB IIRC) has to cost at least $100

      If you think that a microcontroller with 32kB RAM and 512 KB ROM costs >$100 you have never priced one. A microcontroller such as a PICmicro, an Atmel, a Zilog, and so on costs at most $10 for a "deluxe" version with about 30 I/O pins and Flash memory. What Lego is using is most likely a pre-programmed chip w/o Flash, which are about 1/3 of the price. A 512 KB FlashROM chip costs about $6. These are RETAIL prices, what you can get one single chip for. Lego probably gets them for a fraction of the price since they need quite a few of the things.

      I am willing to bet that most of the money from the cost of a Mindstorms kit goes towards marketing and product development. Not towards manufacturing. I'm sure the software inside (and outside) the mindstorms thing cost much more to develop than the hardware.
    • by doon (23278) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:02AM (#7937633) Homepage
      Though I've never played with them because I'm a grown up now

      So you don't play with Lego anymore that you are "grown up"? How sad :) Even though I would consider myself all growned up now (27), I still love mindstorms. Then again having replaced the firmware on my RCX with Lejos [sourceforge.net] and building my own sensors for it, I enojoy it much more then the Programming kit that came with it.
    • by JaredOfEuropa (526365) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:31AM (#7937775) Journal
      Though I've never played with them because I'm a grown up now
      Remember: we do not stop playing because we grow old. We grow old because we stop playing.
    • Re:Inspiration (Score:5, Interesting)

      by Richthofen80 (412488) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:08AM (#7937652) Homepage
      I'd think it may have inspired by the way that our children play today versus how they played twenty years ago.

      Actually, the main point of the lego mindstorms was to change the way kids learned... to make learning and playing the same.

      The prototype for the mindstorms toy was built at the MIT media lab by roboticist Fred Martin [uml.edu]. (who teaches at the University of Massachusetts, Lowell at a budding robotics lab). Fred really wanted to know about how to use computing to educate kids, and lego offered a sum of money to the media lab in order to foster a new type of marketable toy that had "engaging computing" potential. So he built a lego brick with a computer inside, which was the base of the toy.

      Interesting enough, Fred Martin also built the handyboard, which is a great way to get into amateur robotics. As shameless self-promotion, the work I did in Fred Martin's class can be found here [edgiardina.com].
      • Re:Sadly.. (Score:4, Insightful)

        by illusioned (733320) on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:13AM (#7937680) Homepage
        I think that society today is more interested in quick results then in long term effects. When a child is restless, parents seem to just want them to quiet down and look for the easiest ways out. When a parent is too busy with their own lives, the TV should not become a baby sitter. Why? There is no independent thought going on, the child is simply entertained. The child is not forced to think about what is happening in most cases because the answer is inevitably answered later on in the show, if there even is a question to ponder. Parents should never be too busy for their child, if that is the case, they shouldn't have had one at all. I am no sociologist, but one thing that makes me believe that sticking children in front of a TV does a-lot more bad then good is watching my father getting older. Last year all he did was watch TV, even educational things like the discovery channel. I noticed that gradually his mind became a little duller, you could tell by the way that he spoke. He couldn't take it anymore, he even noticed that he was slowing down. Now he works for my sister's school doing odd computer jobs, and he is back to a sort of "normal".
    • by mark-t (151149) <markt@lynx.bc . c a> on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:30AM (#7937772) Journal
      LEGO never had a copyright on its blocks.

      It did, however, have a patent.

      And yes, LEGO's patent has expired... at least with regards to the building brick. The patents on the Technic parts are still alive and well afaik.

      Megabloks, a company that makes a building brick that is essentially compatible with LEGO, opened up shop almost to the day that LEGO's patent expired on the brick and has been slowly and steadily improving the quality of their own product ever since. They aren't half bad right now.

    • by RobotRunAmok (595286) * on Saturday January 10 2004, @11:32AM (#7937779)
      When we found out we were having a boy

      Because girls aren't supposed to build robots? Don't tell that to my six year old Natasha, whose favorite playtime is spent building K'Nex Battlemechs and Bandai Gundams with her dad.

      1953 just called. They want their gender biases back.

      Sheesh.
    • by mark-t (151149) <markt@lynx.bc . c a> on Saturday January 10 2004, @01:14PM (#7938358) Journal
      They are dropping all of the electronics lines, which includes Mindstorms, from their retail division.

      But LEGO Dacta, the educational division of LEGO will still sell Mindstorms stuff. Pitsco is the distributor of LEGO Dacta in the USA, and will sell to anyone anywhere within an area that isn't already serviced by another regional LEGO Dacta supplier.