Pushing The Postal Envelope 173
Alexander Burke writes: "The Annals of Improbable Research has a sidesplitting account of their research into exactly what the USPS will tolerate. They mailed various items -- ranging from the absurd to the grotesque, usually without packaging -- to various real domestic addresses. Said items include a hammer, a rose, a ski (!), a tooth, a brick, a helium balloon, a bottle of water, and many more. It's pure craziness, and definitely worth a read!"
Dedication (Score:1)
Re:UPS vs. USPS (Score:1)
argh (Score:1)
Re:Hardly "side-splitting" (Score:1)
--
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
Of course, you have to doubt the sanity of someone who thinks getting down on their knees and mubling an incantation will get them a perfect afterlife where they are waited on by angels.
Every religion is ridiculous if you choose to look at it in that way. Every religion is correct if you choose to look at it in another way.
Still a government-enforced monopoly (Score:1)
That's as may be, but it's still relying on government to enfore the postal monopoly on first-class mail. Because FedEx isn't allowed to start delivering small non-time-critical envelopes for less than the Post Office does, the Post Office can reap monopoly profits on that service.
Re:Still a government-enforced monopoly (Score:1)
FedEx and UPS offer universal one-price service on package delivery. Not because they have to, but because it turns out that it's more efficient to charge one price than to try to figure out what the perfect price is for every combination of routes. You'd lose more money running helplines explaining to people why their package bounced for lack of 20 cents than you'd gain from charging more delivering to people in the boonies.
FedEx and UPS have service that is MORE universal than that of the post office; they deliver door-to-door just about everywhere whereas the post office in remote locations tends to deliver to a "mail stop" that might be many miles from the recipient address.
If competition were legal, I'd expect better universal service at a lower price.
Re:UPS vs. USPS (Score:1)
Re:UPS vs. USPS (Score:1)
The replacement package arrived a bit better, but STILL had knocks on it. Does UPS play football with these packages?
I used to get packages via the USPS from my girlfriend (now my wife) when I was living in England and they all arrived in REALLY good condition, even fragile items like ornaments.
I'm left with the impression that UPS doesn't actually give a shit about the quality of its delivery system, 'just so long as it gets there'. It's no damn good delivering something if its broken in the process IMHO.
--
Re:This is old news (Score:1)
A repost of a comment as an article is just fine by me, and this is the kind of news that never really goes out of date until everyone's heard it already.
I don't think most people even read the comment. I didn't.
Re:Why is the DEA examining mail? (Score:1)
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
A DAY LATE AND A BUCK SHORT... (Score:1)
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
Well, I hope so. And I hope he never got to whatever it was. People who do things like that deserve all the petty hardships we can throw at them.
Randall.
On a visible but distant shore, a new image of man;
Re:Hardly "side-splitting" are you sure (Score:1)
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
He does? You are kinda free with the medals, aren't you?
The person who was forced to break the brick into little pieces to check for drug content probably had better things to do.
Better things to do? Probably not, if his job involves breaking bricks to check for drug content. Besides, I am not a big fan of War on Drugs and if USPS does break brick apart to check for cocaine inside (which I doubt very much), it would be my pleasure to send somebody a brick once in a while.
And the person who had to lug the snow ski to a mailbox probably does not get enough medical coverage by the USPS to make up for the dent in his back
A ski weights what? A couple of pounds? If that will make a dent in his back, he has bigger problems than weird customers.
Give 'em a bit of respect
I don't see how sending a brick, or a rose, or a ski, or a.... through the mail consitutes disrespect for people working there. Or are you arguing that all pranks and that kind of humor in general is evil and should be strictly verboten?
Kaa
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
Of course, you have to doubt the sanity of someone who thinks taking a lock of their hair and chanting to it will make them fall in love or whatever...
Re:Why is the DEA examining mail? (Score:1)
perhaps a female dog urinated on the brick before they sent it. the male dog could still smell it and went crazy. or the senders could have been doing drugs before they sent the brick, leaving a residue on it. the dea thought the brick contained drugs so they smashed it. if it had drugs they would have found a similar brick and had it delivered, but since it didnt they sent the pieces to the owner.
since an explination wasnt given for how they came to the conclusion it had drugs we just wont know.
use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that
Re:Why is the DEA examining mail? (Score:1)
use LaTeX? want an online reference manager that
Re:That is awesome! (Score:1)
Nope, the reason we are losing the "War on [Some] Drugs" is because it is stupid to involve cops/judges/jails in a futile attempt at changing people's behavior. Drug use (not all use is abuse) should properly be a medical issue not a legal issue.
Then there is the racial aspect, where Blacks and Latinos are thrown into prison for drug violations on a disproportionate basis. Most of the violence that comes about from enforcing drug laws takes place in the barrios and ghettos of AmeriKKKa. If there are valid scientific reasons for this racist policy, where are the scientific studies showing that Whites are not affected by drugs at the same rate that minorities are?
The "War on [Some] Drugs" is just the White man's way of maintaining power over minorities. The crime rate is going down, so why on earth would "fiscally conservative" Whites throw and more more money at the "law enforcement/criminal justice" complex if not to continue suppressing this country's minority citizens?
--
You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
Re:True (Score:1)
--
You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
Re:Why is the DEA examining mail? (Score:1)
A liberal judge will rule against the cops more often than a conservative judge will. If a cop lies about probable cause, then he will have a harder time persuading a liberal judge than a conservative judge that he actually has probable cause, mainly because the conservative judge is more willing to believe said cop on the strength of his word than the liberal judge would.
So in the context of my original post, conservative was EXACTLY the right word to use...
--
You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
Re:That is awesome! (Score:1)
Why? Is it because counter to your protestations, you DO care about our skin color? Minorities are then not "casual users", huh? I think you meant to say "White users"...
--
You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
Re:Holmes (Score:1)
From the Norwegian postal system: (Score:1)
Re:No complaints about the mail here (Score:1)
Anyone want to send me a letter? I wonder what would happen if you mailed it to
Tim
86 Nicholson
3065
with the 00194+0000 barcode.
Re:No complaints about the mail here (Score:1)
Re:UPS vs. USPS (Score:1)
FedEx is starting to get used by a lot more companies. Their prices are competitive and the packaging is unmolested. A box we got from UPS the other day had a big gashed/crushed spot in it. The UPS guy said we should tell the sender to pack their things better. Uh....
Let's also look at the labor situation. UPS is completely unionized, at FedEx, only the pilots are.
Re:Played this game in college (Score:1)
Some of the things they sent:
*A (plastic) jar of peanut butter (with a piece of chocolate inside...they had a thing for old Reese's commercials).
*A toilet seat.
*One side of those plastic "wet floor" signs.
Re: (Score:1)
Re:UPS vs. USPS (Score:1)
Not to criticize your findings of strange items, but according to UPS's shipping guidlines [ups.com], tires and bare metal parts are quite acceptable if common sense is used, however some of the items you mentioned would have never left my store they way you described.
Nonetheless, I agree with UPS's reliability. For a retail shipping outlet I actually *see* what goes into these brown boxes (yes, I did a severed bear head too for a taxidermist).
IMHO, I think USPS should get out of larger parcels altogether (12x12x12 max). Their tracking systems, claims process and customer service is horrible. They need to be deregulated like NSI was over internet domains and start making shipping/mailing a open market.
- Slash
Re:No complaints about the mail here (Score:1)
Yes. The USPS is surprisingly accomodating about addresses like that, especially if your destination is a small town where the postal clerks know everyone by name.
Re:This is old news (Score:1)
(Especially since doing that would result in them seeing some... unpleasant... things fairly frequently.)
--
Obfuscated e-mail addresses won't stop sadistic 12-year-old ACs.
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
Re:Helium balloon (Score:1)
I'm thinking that, if it is in a balloon, it is in fact wrapped. And hey, there is some helium naturally in the air, I would guess then that we are all transferring a bit of unauthorized helium around with us everywhere we go. Saying you're lightening the plane, yeah, okay, but you are still taking up volume, so they have a right to at least a bit of postage, even if it is not measurable on the postal scales. :P
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
No need to want anything more than that, but the problem many people have, often you don't get that much: mail that takes ages to get delivered, is lost, or arrives in damaged condition (even if packaged properly...).
Re:Top20! (Score:1)
--
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
You're not?? Then WHO THE HELL WAS IT!!!!
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
Re:No complaints about the mail here (Score:1)
Don Armstrong -".naidnE elttiL etah I"
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:1)
I guess people assume that because it's the government, it can't be efficient, despite receiving proof that it's a pretty well-run system every day in their mailbox.
Actually, it is a self sustaining private corporation. It happens to be owned by the government but it is not the government. This happened as part of the Postal Reorginization act, passed into law in 1970. Prior to this change, the post office had been overwhelmed, and was unreliable and inefficient. Major hubs were completely clogged, the Postmaster General had no control over the wages of the workers, the condition of the vehicles and buildings used, etc.Re:That is awesome! (Score:1)
But it's a fact that ANYBODY wandering the streets so high that they are a risk to others should be jailed. In the same way a drunk person wandering the streets causing injury to others or damage to property should be jailed.
But as long as they aren't infringing on other's rights, you are basically correct.
Where you become drastically wrong is that shit about race. Nobody has claimed that Caucasians don't use drugs, and I don't know of any studies showing that Latinos or Blacks use statistically more drugs than Whites. Most minorities who are in jail for drug convictions got caught for something. For socioeconomic reasons, proportionally more minorities are involved in dealing drugs (this is based on my personal observations, and uh... "purchases"). Trafficking and dealing are the primary targets of most enforcement, far more than users.
Also, in general, minority community standards seem to make it more acceptable, or at least a more regular practice to use drugs in places that are out in the open, in communities that are more heavily policed due to generally higher crime rates (i.e. the barrios and ghettos you referred to). This is purely logical, although it may have unfortunate statistical results in your mind. I would counter that if the people in those ghettos weren't shooting each other all the time, the cops wouldn't be riding around looking for people to arrest in those neighborhoods and wouldn't have to use any means necessary to supress gang-related activity, etc. You would counter that my brutal white suppression of your economic chances has resulted in that situation. I would counter that many minorities have faced worse situations when they first came to this country, but they prioritized their children, their families, and educations, and within a generation or two they were out of their ghettos.
My point? Work to eliminate the backdrop of violent crime in your community by reaching out to children and lobbying for educational opportunities for all people. Then take some damned responsibility within these communities to care for your children and instill them with values that emphasize education and success, not the "coolness" of being gang members, or stealing, etc. Don't blabber to me about oppression. The vast majority of Americans don't care about your skin color, but rather about your behavior. If you want success and you go for it, you will get it. As for the War on [Some] Drugs, we should all be united against this silly waste of our money. Let's put those dollars into education and work training programs as well as drug rehabilitation for hard-core addicts who are a threat to themselves and society. Leave the casual users alone, legalize the distribution channels, tax it, and I'll open up a cannibis shop. :)
Originally posted.. (Score:1)
Re:Top20! (Score:1)
Top20! (Score:1)
Re:No complaints about the mail here (Score:1)
Re:No complaints about the mail here (Score:1)
For another of my friends, you don't need to write his street address on the envelope, as his family have moved several times within the one postcode. So on the envelope, you just write [name], [postcode], AUSTRALIA; and that's all.
Re:Further shennanigans. (Score:1)
It was sick and childish but it's better than killing those people I guess. And point being, the mail service delivered it without question.
Re:How do the times compare? (Score:2)
I can send a package from Portland OR, to little towns in central South Dakota that are way off in the middle of no-where in 2-4 days depending on what part of the year it is (snow and things slow down the mail). That's about 2100 km away.
There are different Priorities that cost different amounts of money. Over Christmas, most of the packages I sent to South Dakota or Florida on a Friday were delivered on the following Monday or Tuesday.
If I send a package from Portland to Denver Colorado (which has a huge airport), I can send the package by 7pm and it will be delivered by 9am the next day.
Drug laws (Score:2)
--
Return address hacking (Score:2)
If you reverse the addresses, you can send a letter without a stamp. This has been confirmed, including in different zip codes and states. May take a while though.
--
Played this game in college (Score:2)
We also discussed what would happen if we mailed a pineapple, with "hand cancel" written on the outside. Those spines are sharp!
The correct address for Santa (Score:2)
Santa Claus
North Pole
Canada
HOH OHO
Pope
Freedom is Slavery! Ignorance is Strength! Monopolies offer Choice!
Re:No complaints about the mail here, thanks. (Score:2)
I have delivered some weird stuff, including bees. Since the Unibomber, we have been more careful about odd boxes.
Any leak from a box is considered a hazardous material, and will be treated as such.
Thanks for the good words.
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:2)
And as to the "use a courier". No. A brick isn't a delicate product which requires a courier. The only way it'd break is if some moron takes a hammer to it...
It doesn't matter if someone mails a brick for scientific analysis, or for the joke value. As long as they pay the postage on it, the USPS is contractually obligated to deliver it.
I think you're the one in denial. Lawsuit exist specifically for the purpose of forcing someone to do what they contracted to do and then refused to follow through. This isn't receiving hot coffee and suing over the temperature, this is using the courts to force a big corporation to honor its word like you'd expect anyone else to do. The lawsuit only needs to be for the court costs and damages. In this case, $5 should cover it. But the idea is that you don't let a corporation get away with screwing around with you just because they can.
And if the cops think it has drugs in it, they can act like they'd have to in any other context. Obtain a search warrant, take the minimum steps necessary to determine if it does. They should definately notify the owner, show them the warranty, and repay any damages conducted in their overzealous search.
Anything else is simply an abuse of power.
Do you have any better way to make them own up to their bullshit?
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:2)
What if that was a brick from a historic building, or was being sent somewhere for lab analysis?
Doesn't anyone see a problem with the government opening your mail, destroying it, and then not even refunding the postage?
It's not like they thought it was a bomb or anything (they'd have blown it up - and the person who went to pick it up would have been met by the cops). They simply thought it MIGHT contain drugs.
Wired predates the Annals in this sort of fun. (Score:2)
In the last couple of issues, they received a Mac Keyboard that was stripped of all its keys, save ones that had the shipping address. They have been sent clear plastic boxes with visible circuit boards that had the address spelled out in LED's, and other cool things that frankly, I am too lazy to bother remembering, save that I was surprised that they had actually arrived at the Wired offices.
Anyway, getting back on track here, Wired was promoting this kind of tomfoolery well in advance of the Annals etc. etc. So there.
Where did I put my drink?
Re:Still a government-enforced monopoly (Score:2)
Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | http://www.infamous.net/
Re:Use of ZIP+4 codes (Score:2)
Holmes (Score:2)
No complaints about the mail here (Score:2)
I also, years ago, mailed off my state income tax. It required my "Mail Station" as opposed to my usual mail address (it turns out that that was really a poorly worded form, and what they really wanted was the regular address). Well, my "Mail Station" was called "Farley Station", so I entered that. Six months later someone from the post office finally figured out what the return address was supposed to be and I got my refund. I never complained about the mail since.
Re: (Score:2)
Re:Um, they threatened to fine the RECIPIENT of ma (Score:2)
//rdj
Re:This is old news (Score:2)
Re:Yeah snail mail.. (Score:2)
Re:UPS vs. USPS (Score:2)
Re:Why is the DEA examining mail? (Score:2)
Actually, you are wrong from two different perspectives.
1) The views that you speak of are generally considered "classically liberal", which the US was founded upon. Liberal means "favoring change" which was important to the oppressed colonies.
2) Conservatism literally means "Favoring traditional views and values; tending to oppose change." Now, the US comes from a classical liberal perspective, and has since moved away from it (a matter of degree, compared with other countries). So the "traditional view", or conservative view often refers to the anti-government sentiment that you also refer to. Of course, it also refers to other classical political traits such as pro-military, racism (don't flame me), and agriculture.
-rt-
Re:This is old news (Score:2)
I'm glad they posted it. Do you really expect them to read every comment and not post anything already included there?
-rt-
Hahaha! This is the best one! (Score:2)
I'm going to be laughing over that one for day! :)
Use of ZIP+4 codes (Score:2)
The cool thing is that you use these as your sole adderss in some cases. I sent a letter out with no return address and just the numbers "92115-8055" (my PO Box's ZIP+4) on the front once and it made it just fine...
Same thing goes for family names:
will often make it as well...
Re:Why is the DEA examining mail? (Score:2)
Plus, in order to make a brick, it has to be baked in a kiln at >1,000C. This would surely change any drugs hidden in a pocket inside the brick, on a molecular level. If not, then surely you'd end up with one big solidified chunk of drug on the inside?
I mean, isn't it enough to chip off a small amount of the exterior of the brick and analyze it (GC/MS, maybe?) to make sure it's really a normal brick?
--
Re:Why is the DEA examining mail? (Score:2)
There are a lot of "radical conservatives" under your "conservatives want to put constraints on people" metric -- Diane Fienstien is my favorite villian of the day, of course, and George W. Bush ranks up there on that measure, too. Some of the more folks who were far more liberal than either of the two above on that metric included Ronald Reagan, George Bush Sr., John Ashcroft (to some degree), the Cato Institute, and quite a few of the "Blue Dog" Democrats (who, paradoxically, are often called "conservative" democrats, despite being much more liberal by your definition).
The point I'm making is that there is not definitive text on conservativism. To say that there is only one kind of conservative is like saying there is only one kind of feminist, or one kind of hacker (for a slashdot definition). The words conservative and liberal have become worse than useless for labeling people and movements -- they mean so many different things to so many different people, and have accrued so much baggage that the words puts people into very useless, very high sided boxes, that do nothing to compartmentalize any actual beliefs.
Without context, conservative and liberal are almost always the wrong words to use in any conversation that demands thought.
Re:No complaints about the mail here (Score:2)
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:2)
Where exactly do I try imposing my belief on someone else? I believe everyone has a right to say and to think what they want; you have a right to believe in whatever you want. I have a right to believe that you're being superstitious. I'm posting an opinion on a public board, not coming into your house and converting you by gunpoint.
--
Re:Santa at North Pole etc (Score:2)
----
It happens that I had recently read an article on wordplay in the Smithsonian magazine in which the author asserted that some puckish soul had once sent a letter addressed, with playful ambiguity, to
HILL
JOHN
MASS
and it had gotten there after the postal authorities had worked out that it was to be read as "John Underhill, Andover, Mass." (Get it?)
----
Hmmm, Not really a valid address -- not only is there no ZIP, there's no street, no number, etc etc... :)
Actually, the whole Bill Bryson excerpt there is a good read, and relavant to the current USPS topic :) ... Good luck getting a letter to me: Lord Carrot, /. Poster, Adelaide, Australia :)
rr
good sports (Score:2)
Dude this rocked. (Score:2)
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:2)
When I was in Prague 2 years ago, I shipped a box with 14 bottles of Absinth back to the USA. Absinth is an alcoholic drink containing Wormwood extract that is banned in every country in the world except for the Czech Republic and Andorra. It's a hallucinogenic drink.
We wrote that the contents of the box were 8 bottles of wine, because we were afraid that you are only allowed to import a certain amount of alcohol before you have to pay taxes on it (that, and it is illegal in the USA).
Anyways, the box arrived at the proper address in the USA after only 2 weeks (shipped ground/boat). One bottle was broken and one was completely empty, but the rest were unharmed. We packed everything in a very a complicated way and upon opening it, everything was the exactly as we left it. There was no tampering and I don't believe that the US or Czech post even opened the box. The empty bottle must have had a leaky lid and its contents evaporated (Absinth is 70% alcohol).
True (Score:2)
that's just not very nice (Score:2)
The USPS is an organization staffed with real people, with a limited budget, and with a legal mandate to try to deliver mail. If people do these kinds of things, their costs go up and other mail delivery suffers. And a number of poor people have to deal with your smelly cheese or risk injuring themselves on your poorly packaged item.
People here would complain loudly if a 10M file clogged up their mail queue. It seems much worse to impose these kinds of physical hazards on real postal workers.
Re:Troll (Score:2)
Lord Arathres
Hardly "side-splitting" (Score:2)
The USPS stole/lost all the gifts I posted home to rellies in Oz on my first visit there, I was broke at the time, so I'm not laughing. I've never sent snail-mail from the US again.
Cough, splutter
Further shennanigans. (Score:3)
It made it through.
The friend took one look at it, wrote "return to sender" on it and stuck on another stamp. The sending friend was convulsed with laughter for several minutes upon receiving this.
We'd just done a dissection lab in high school biology... I don't remember who she sent them to, but it was at least two people. Didn't hear how that one turned out...
Ah, the fun we had when we were kids
Re:How do the times compare? (Score:3)
There are a variety of services one can choose, first class or priority mail (air) is usually 2-3 days, and is the normal method for letters and priority packages. Parcel post (which I imagine these were sent as) is essentially a ground shipment method and normally takes several days cross-country but is less expensive. Bulk or book rates are slower yet.
Human Remains (Score:3)
This is old news (Score:3)
Re:Hahaha! This is the best one! (Score:3)
part of the problem (Score:4)
Last summer, I tracked down a fellow from Montana who has some blacksmithing tools I wanted, and sent him a check for a few hundred dollars. A few days later, I woke up to the sound of a UPS truck pulling in my driveway bright and early:
*slam*
*swoosh* (rear door opening)
"goddamn... fuggin..piece o...hrrrrr"
*stompstompstompstomp*
*hwathump* (on my doorstep)
"...can't fuggin believe... fuggin two of 'em... arrrr..."
*stompstompstompstomp*
*hwathump* (again on my doorstep)
By the time I got my jeans on, the truck was pulling away. And there they were: one 140 lb. anvil, and one 150 lb. anvil (nice ones, too), side by side on my doorstep, no packaging of any kind -- just a mailing label taped to the side of each -- right up against the screen door so that I couldn't get out.
Served me right, I suppose.
Jon
Comment removed (Score:4)
Mailing bricks is specifically prohibited. (Score:4)
Usually they'll mail them only if they don't know they're bricks. I hear there's a specific regulation about it.
It's not to keep you from mailing bricks attached to business-reply cards...
Seems a LONG time back (like before the US highway system was complete - and I mean US, not Interstate) there was a town in the upper half of lower Michigan, which wanted to build a town hall. Out of bricks.
There were no paved roads nearby, and no brick makers either.
So they bought some bricks down in Detroit and looked into what it would cost to ship them commercially. Then they checked how much it would cost to mail them first-class. First class rates are standard, with the easy-to-deliver metro mail subsidizing the hard-to-deliver cross-country and back-country stuff.
Turned out it was MUCH cheaper to wrap each brick and send it first class than to ship them.
So they did.
And the post office delivered every last one of 'em. At considerable impact to their budget.
And then the regulations were changed - before somebody decided to build a hotel or something. B-)
I'm suprised that they didn't try.... (Score:4)
Mailing Tires (Score:4)
It's possible, though, that the USPS in AK has a higher tolerance because of the lack of other options for moving stuff around in Alaska. A buddy of mine said that his grandfather once wanted a Christmas tree where he lived in Kodiak (an island off the southern coast of AK) so he came to Anchorage, bought one, dragged it into the post office, and mailed it. No extra packaging, no problem.
MyopicProwls
Re:Why is the DEA examining mail? (Score:4)
Please stop confusing conservatisim with the philosphies of the judges and prosecutors who stopped believing in individual liberties and have fully subscribed to the notion of state control.
Even though a nasty, pro-big government, anti-individual liberty doofus like George W. Bush has co-opted and perverted words like "coservative" and "compassionate", there's no reason to believe that vile filth that promises to continue the last 50 years of ever increasing federal government encroachment is any type of "conservativism" that any real conservative would understand.
Conservatism is essentially about "leave me the fuck alone," not "force other fuckers to stop doing stuff I don't like." Most politicians, on both sides of the aisle, long ago realized that "leave me the fuck alone" doesn't get anyone elected, while "force other fuckers to stop doing stuff I don't like" seems to get every dickhead on earth out to vote for you. It's pretty sad, really. But it's not conservativism.
Re:What to mail, what not to. (Score:4)
I never quite understood the complaints people had about the USPS; you put something in the mail, in a few days it's delivered. What more do you want? I guess people assume that because it's the government, it can't be efficient, despite receiving proof that it's a pretty well-run system every day in their mailbox. Of course, a scary amount of people in this country believe angels involve themselves in their daily lives, and witches exist, so I guess logic is in short supply...
--
UPS vs. USPS (Score:5)
Other strange things that have come through the system include an unwrapped matress, a freshly severed bear's head, LOTS of tires with no wrapping, a car bumper that looked like it had been ripped off the car, complete with the license plate, boxes of live crickets which usually break open so you have crickets loose all over the place, individual car parts with no wrapping. Rank food is quite common on return items.
Fortunately, at UPS about 3% of the volume involves packages like this, so there are regular methods to transport them internally (they don't travel on the conveyor belts) I would imagine that the post office simply doesn't have the facilities to deal with a large number of unusual objects.
-Restil
Re:Why is the DEA examining mail? (Score:5)
Packages in the USPS care are supposed to be Constitutionally protected from illegal search and seizure, but search warrants are all to easy to obtain. All it takes is a cop lying about probable cause and one conservative "law and order" "tough on crime" judge who has never heard of the Fourth Amendment...
--
You think being a MIB is all voodoo mind control? You should see the paperwork!
What to mail, what not to. (Score:5)
I would advise you, though, not to put the postal employees through too much grief. Their job is tough enough as it is. When you want to send some critical and strangely sized package, just do us all a favor and use FedEx [fedex.com] or UPS [ups.com] or one of the many other private carriers. And pack appropriately! The poor guy who had to figure out what to do with the moldy and stinky cheese deserves a medal. The person who was forced to break the brick into little pieces to check for drug content probably had better things to do. And the person who had to lug the snow ski to a mailbox probably does not get enough medical coverage by the USPS to make up for the dent in his back.
These are people, people! Give 'em a bit of respect, or at least think about what they have to put up with on those days when you want to shoot someone because of the quality of service you receive.
Mystery Explained (Score:5)
So THAT's what happened to aunt June...
---