D&D Trailer 292
hubersan writes "The new trailer is up at http://www.seednd.com Oh MAN. Lotsa nice CG.." I suppose it would be rude to link directly to an Akamai URL, so I won't do it. Quicktime, naturally. Conscience strikes: should I see this movie and give my money to Time-Warner? Update: 10/26 6:09 PM by michael : Sadly, we've been asked to take down the direct link to the file.
Re:Conscience? (Score:5)
Another take on it:
But that's just me.
fearbush.com [fearbush.com]
Re:Give money to T-W (Score:1)
Re:Semi-Official site with good info (Score:2)
Don't tell us they are still working on it 6 weeks from the release date on December 8th...
Knights of the Dinner Table (Score:1)
-Vel
Re:CG? (Score:1)
"Do not trifle with dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup."
Yes, I know its a Tolkein spoof.
Re:hmmm (Score:1)
If you want to actually display hypocrisy, you'll have to find the SAME PERSON saying opposite things. And even then-- who cares? Simply pointing out hypocrisy is a pointless kid's game. Identifying real issues and finding solutions is something that's actually worthwhile. Yes, we're all upset with the MPAA. But we're also very interested in their product. Are we dedicated enough to boycott? Or perhaps there's a way to hurt the MPAA without a boycott? Is there an idealistic conflict here, or not?
Re:Semi-Official site with good info (Score:1)
Re:Simple. (Score:3)
>the EFF. That's $24 a movie, so it will make you
>evaluate what you see more critically.
I really like the concept of this. This isn't unlike some of the ideas to use services like PayPal [paypal.com] to compensate music artists (long
In a way, this is kind of a self-tax, where you get to decide where your tax money goes to. This is a neat idea! Worried about polluting the earth, but you have a long commute? Give 50 cents a gallon for every gallon of gas you use to your favority charity. This is a really interesting concept, thanks for sharing...
By the way, the link to donate to the eff using paypal is here [eff.org].
-Twid
Re:A stroke of originality! (Score:2)
But don't you see? Carmina Burana makes EVERYTHING better!!!!
Re:A little let down (Score:1)
--
Re:Well, hell Slashdot.. (Score:1)
Re:money to TW? nah (Score:1)
---
MPAA boycot rules/ideas (Score:3)
If a serious boycot was done, it could end up hurting the smaller, independent studios, the ones that need our support. Is giving a few cents to an evil empire so bad that you don't want to help those small rebel forces trying to make good film?
I suggest that before you decide to boycot a movie, look at who is producing the movie, not who is distributing it and base the decision on that.
As sort of an analogy...
I was a paper boy once. The paper had an editorial cartoon that offended the local Unions in our town. The union then boycotted the paper. But, the union, in all fairness, suggested that those that recieved delivery to still tip the paper carier (and maybe a little extra because we got payed per paper) to prevent a loss of revenue to the little guy.
We should all follow this idea.
hmmm (Score:3)
Conscience? (Score:5)
It all depends. If you're Lawful Evil aligned, there's no problem at all with seeing a Time-Warner movie. (If you're Chaotic Evil aligned, you might want instead to sneak into the movie. Chaotic Good might also do this, as they might rationalize that it's not evil since you'd not be giving money to Time-Warner.)
Date? (Score:2)
Of course, the anti-D&D Crowd back in the day beat TSR with the wonderful "Mazes and Monsters" starring Tom Hanks. Fortunately, Tom Hanks went on to much better movies in his career, like Bachelor Party and Joe Vs. The Volcano.
Re:Conscience strikes (Score:2)
Yeah, those bus companies were instrumental in passive civil rights legislation... geez...
QuickTime in Linux? (off topic) (Score:2)
Has anyone managed to get a QuickTime viewer working under Linux? Apple unfortunately didn't have any Linux support on their website last time I checked (I wonder why), and the few Linux QuickTime articles I found on the web were no help. Any slashdotters out there who have gotten this to work, please let me know!
Re:We both know there is more to D & D than that.. (Score:2)
Re:Conscience... (Score:2)
Re:Well, hell Slashdot.. (Score:2)
Re:We both know there is more to D & D than that.. (Score:2)
"Those people were just weird or losers to begin with." There, I said it. The tiny number of people who lose touch with reality while playing RPGs were pretty far gone anyway. I'm pretty sure that just about anything could've pushed the over the edge. If it wasn't D&D then it could've been professional sports, depressing poetry, Road Runner cartoons, etc.
Just for comparison, bow many people are killed each year in fraternity hazing incidents? All because they so desperately want to be part of an abusive and manipulative group that they're willing to debase themselves, place their lives in danger, commit criminal acts, and lie to protect their abusers? That commonly accepted social behaviour seems far more dangerous than any game of medieval cops-and-robbers could ever be.
In fact, I think that some of the most brilliant religious minds in history would've been ardent fans of D&D. Look at Milton's 'Paradise Lost', with a downright sympathetic view of the fallen angel Lucifer. Heck, large chunks of D&D's original mythology were lifted straight out of Dante's classic works. Were those authors, so revered by the church in their time, also whistling in the dark while invoking demonic forces?
The world is full of destitute, foolish, unstable, and depressed people. IMHO, the church's true mission is to help these people and illustrate by example. This goal is _not_ served by endlessly engaging on one foolish witch hunt after another. Most churchgoes know better than to fall for this sort of nonsense. Try using the brain God gave you, and maybe you'll find youself joining them.
-BryanScrew the D&D movie.... (Score:2)
I'd pay good money to see how they visualize each '66' on the critical damage tables :D
Re:Waiting for LotR (Score:2)
Consciousness is not what it thinks it is
Thought exists only as an abstraction
Re:More than a couple: (Score:2)
On the other hand, football players are more likely to commit violent crimes, as much as ten times as likely as the general population.
Hence, football players are one hundred times as dangerous to society as D&D players.
I wish I had a link to the appropriate stats. I know they're out there; I hope someone finds and posts the link.
And, Nathaniel, every single one of your cited sources is spurious at best and a full-on lie at worst.
--
Re:Great visuals, poor acting... (Score:4)
Actually, the one that got me was something along the lines of "Dude, that musta been some like major magical experiment gone wrong or something!"
*sigh*
Re:Great visuals, poor acting... (Score:2)
"Dude, I totally wanna be the knight and do all that stuff like kill things and rescue chicks in trouble." "No way, I'll be the knight. You can be the jester." "That guy from Top Gun?" "No dude, those midgets that make you laugh." "But I'm not a midget." "So crawl on your knees, bee-yaawwwtch." And then the person dressed as the knight slaps the other in the ass with a sword, leaving a welt that causes a rift between the two cliques in the Winnebago as half see it as a by-product of playful fun while the others see it as a sign of the increasing violence of one of their number.
Yeah, I'm waitin' in line for that one.
DIRECT LINK HERE (Score:2)
Here's the crappy trailer [apple.com]
Here's a direct link to the file, broken up. I couldn't past it in entirely because apparently slashdot thinks long strings are lame. Which is lame. Ironic, huh?
http://a784.g.akamai.net/5/784/51/4cba529b0c96f
1a1a1aaa2198c627970773d80669d84574a8d80d 3cb12453c02589f25382f668c9329e0375e81785ea61cd36a
If this post is removed, slashdot censors.
Re:Conscience... (Score:2)
Re:More than a couple: (Score:2)
and compare the percentages?
What are the odds that a) it's a wash, or b) the percentages are the wrong way?
Re:Come on! (Score:3)
hey, lay the hell off.
haven't you read your Joseph Campbell [jcf.org]?
There are only so many plots and story elements to work with, if you intend to make a satisfying piece of work. So why not focus on those elements that hit closest to home? like getting the girl, defeating the villian, etc. these elements are metaphors for challenges you'll be facing all the rest of your days.
To prove my point, I guaruntee that a wizened old man will send the main character off on his journey in the D&D movie. Because HE, the old man, is an element common to almost every epic, myth or parable that can be considered an 'adventure', throughout all of human history, from every culture and continent.
ok, so I'm out ill today. I have a really good point about this, and if it coming off incoherently, I apologize. Maybe someone else could back me up in a more eloquent fashion? I'll shut up now...
:)Fudboy
Re:We both know there is more to D & D than that.. (Score:2)
two reported cases, of
previously distrubed individuals
commiting henious acts.
However, there has never been
any conclusive proof that occurences
of said sort are higher in the role-playing
community than amongst the regulars. There
have been a few studies that show a lower
occurance of violence amongst role-players...
but they did have some questionable aspects
to them.
Even for those few sick individuals who
did commit some horrible act, you can
not that they would or wouldn't
have done these things w/o exposure to
role-playing games.
---
RobK
Re:DIRECT LINK HERE (Score:2)
Eric
Re:Star Wars Episode II Trailer (Score:2)
You can even find this 'trailer' on adcritic, where they admit that, even though it's a fake, it's a cool fake, so they're hosting it.
Eric
How about a warning next time? (Score:2)
( 4 minutes to download a 26Meg video, just to find out that I can't play the stinking thing!. )
--------
As for boycotting Time/Warner: that's where the rubber hits the road. It's easy enough for me to boycott something that I wouldn't see anyways. (whoop de doo). It's not a boycott unless you don't purchase/see things that you would if it weren't for the boycott. Either shit or get off the pot (or get off your high horse if all you're going to do is shit us).
It's somewhat like when Ghandi started asking people to boycott the British Textile mills and start wearing homespun. It's not like people liked homespun. What they liked was the idea of getting the british off their backs. To do that, they took (cool-looking and often better made) british cloth off of their backs.
If you're going to take on the fight, you've got to be willing to take the hit.
Those who aren't willing to fight for their freedom don't deserve it.
Malcom X
`ø,,ø`ø,,ø!
Well, hell Slashdot.. (Score:5)
Give money to T-W (Score:2)
Evil, evil, evil... Just can't match that in the movies.
--
Re:Great visuals, poor acting... (Score:2)
Not that uncommon, really. Music from Braveheart was heard in a sizable percentage of trailers over the past year (or more.)
--
Another alignment table (Score:2)
OK we've got D&D, Dune and LOTR on the way (Score:2)
Theres a few fantasy films that I'd love to see made:
Dragonlance: Either from the D&D adventures or the orignal books. If only to have Tas and Raistlin in a movie...
Fafhrd & The Gray Mouser: Weird plot lines, weird characters,weird leopard boats... would make a great film and Terry Pratchett obviously took his Death persona from these books.
Elric: The series would tranfser to film very well, the ending might put a damper on any sequels though...
Re:DIRECT LINK HERE (Score:2)
Perhaps the update shoud have written, "We have been informed that direct linking screws up load balancing, please go here [seednd.com] instead" and not "Sadly, we've been asked to take down the direct link to the file." which really sounds like legal bullying.
Re:We both know there is more to D & D than that.. (Score:2)
Or how about: "Didn't Willie Nelson's great great great great great great great ... great grandfather play the Crusaids concerts to raise money for the crusaders?"
Re:hmmm (Score:2)
Re:More than a couple: (Score:2)
But I doubt that slashdot has enough storage.
Re:hmmm (Score:2)
My point was, we have to have something that is based on actual thought process. Right now we have it so that the trolls, karma-whores and slashbots can all participate in the moderation system and all it amounts to is 'stay with the flock or you are totally fucked' type of moderation. How about seeing a truly insightful but not quite majority opinion comment get moderated up? It isn't going to happen. Or if it does it will quickly get meta-modded to 'overrated' and that will be that. What a waste.
Re:Waiting for LotR (Score:2)
I can't help thinking 'My god! This is gonna suck!' and yet I'm excited. Will I go watch this movie? You bet. It's like a childhood dream come true, and no way I'm gonna pass on that geekfest!
Simple. (Score:5)
Every time you see an $8 TW movie, send $16 to the EFF. That's $24 a movie, so it will make you evaluate what you see more critically.
It's not like we don't have enough expendable income in this country. Today, at my local best buy in rockville, they called in the riot police because the people who lined up at 5 am for Playstation2's were trying to beat up the people who lined up at midnight and fell asleep.
Try going to the local line of rabid PS2 shoppers and tell them that the PS2 is selling their fair use rights out the window. I bet you they'll all ask you if they could sign away their "fair use" thingies for a lower number in line.
Re:hmmm (Score:2)
A little let down (Score:5)
Don't give your money to time warner (Score:2)
Problem solved!
I guess the Geek won . . . (Score:2)
I remember taping paper covers over my D&D books* in high school-- circa 1977 -- so no one would know what I was carrying around.
It wasn't a matter of getting beat up for being such a geek . . . it was having to explain what the hell the things were. I think there was one other guy in school who knew about gaming, and he was too busy trying to get into M.I.T. to start a campaign.
Now . . . movies? D&D appearing in sitcoms? Geekdom is really in yer face these days.
Stefan
* Second printing of the original three-book set, now signed by Gygax hisself!
Re:Tom Baker's in this? (Score:2)
I smell blood in the water (Score:2)
And then boys and girls, it is a sure bet that every (and there are quite a few, looking to cash in on pre-LOTR swords and sorcery mania - look at all the mar's movies made/being made recently) every fantasy picture in pre-production is going to get shit-canned by nervy executives eyeing the Hindenburg-like demise of DnD.
Further to this, come xmas 2001 when Peter Jackson's LOTR fucking blows the DOORS off theaters around the world; we will see a horde of shoddy knock off's hastily produced only to die horribly, and the cycle beings anew. I'd be surprised if there weren't a few sucesses, but for the most part they will be about as satisfying as Mission To Mars.
And just a word on the trailer - pretty-boy main characters spouting dialogue lifted from Scream?? No, no, no, no, no.
Also speaking as someone in the FX industry - film schedules are hellish, political beasts. Whoever pulled the FX off for this look like they were asked to produce a TITANIC amount of shots in probably a very short time, and almost certainly with infighting among the people driving the project (happens EVERY time). What I saw here, taking into consideration what must have been a grueling post-production peroid, was very impressive for what it is. Jurasic Park/Dragonheart quality is very expensive to produce when you consider the cost of just one Softimage seat, the SGI/Wintel box to run it, the per-CPU cost of licensing an advanced renderer like Pixar's PRMAN (you should see that bastard do lizard skin) the cost of the operator, the compositing suites, the film scanning and recording, shader development yadda yadda yadda. Not to mention the sheer volume of research, motion tests, building and testing working IK/FK rigs for each character (skeletons, basically). Frankly I'm amazed they pulled it off and if some of the CG looks, well, CG-ish, just consider the amount of work that was put into it. Frankly if I saw a job like that come across my desk it'd give me a case of the screaming heebie-jeebies.
Re:A little let down (Score:2)
Semi-Official site with good info (Score:2)
Re:Flash graphics....Poor..... (Score:2)
Actually, I thought she looked just like the princess in "The Neverending Story".
Re:hmmm (Score:2)
;
The whole "Bug in Slashcode" thing sounds like a crock of shit to me. I just think they don't want people getting into it unless they are caring enough to figure out how to get there.
Personally, I think placing it semi-prominently in the FAQ should be good enough. Here you are, knock yourself out. Better yet, knock out an overzealous moderator.
Re:Another reason to hate my PC (Score:2)
So, starting in the next release, you won't have to worry about that anymore. Of course, that doesn't help for the current release...
Re:A little let down (Score:2)
Re:More than a couple: (Score:2)
off topic? I was directly
responding to the arguements
the guy put forward.
It's too late now(no one is reading
this thread) but that is pure
unabashed bullshit.
---
RobK
Why worry? (Score:2)
Um, sure... how else are you going to see it?
Come on! (Score:5)
Jeremy Irons, how low you've slipped. For shame.
damnit... (Score:2)
and if only I knew the system better, would it be cool to replace it with one of the Mac-using-but-Intel-advertisors Blue Man Group commercials?
--
Gonzo Granzeau
Consumer Warning (Score:2)
Although they may seem alike in some respects (both are set in a fantasy world with fantastic creatures, monsters, magic, etc.) one was produced by Hollywood studios for millions of dollars, while the other was produced by a band of computer geeks who barely know each other and wanted all the thrill of a role-playing game without much of the actual role-playing. While MUD (the movie) does have a cast of thousands of characters, all of them have (mostly) the same items, with the lead characters having an insane amount of gold and experience. What's worse, they fight the same monsters over and over again, sometimes into the wee hours of the morning, with long breaks where the characters do nothing but sleep. The characters start saying things for no apparent reason (what does 'lag' mean anyway?) and sometimes disappear or end up frozen in place for no apparent reason.
While there is nothing illegal about MUD (the movie), we are concerned that unscrupulous theater managers and video vendors may try to pass off MUD (the movie) as D&D (the movie). Don't settle for immitations. The real D&D movie is not yet in theatres, nor are tapes of it available. If someone should represent MUD (the movie) as D&D (the movie) please contact the MPAA immediately. It is vitally important that the MPAA not be denied the money it needs to dest^H^H^H^Hprotect artistic freedom. Thank you.
fearbush.com [fearbush.com]
Re:Come on! (Score:2)
I'm sure anyone in film or the lowliest film student would disagree with that. Its called mass-marketing and a generic overly-used formula. There's tons of creativity out there, I've seen more 'satisfying pieces of work' at iFilm.com with a budget that is around what it costs to film 1/300th of a second of films like these.
Scathing review of this travesty at Gamegrene.com (Score:5)
Plus they also have an ongoing series reviewing some of the best fantasy movies of the 1980s.
Good to see a comparison, and how bad this new one is compared to the old classics.
Re:Come on! (Score:2)
Keep your characters and setting consistant, please. Not only does this look a lot like TPM, it'll be just as silly.
Last frame of the trailer (Score:2)
Internet keyword: DnD
Did I misread it? If not, what is an internet keyword? My browser (IE5 - I'm at work) thinks I want to go to MSN when I type DnD in the address box.
--
LotR vs. SW:Episode I (Score:2)
We've got:
- cute/innocent chick ruler (From Ep1)
- Nasty council/advisor types (From Ep1)
- Marlon Wayans vs. Jar Jar (From Ep1)
- Way cool CG cities (From Ep1)
- Way cool CG dragons (From LotR)
- Kids with swords (From both)
- Bad guys with stupid makeup (From Ep1)
- Creepy Goblins (From LotR)
- Lightning from finger tips (okay, that was EpVI...)
- Extremely dramatic music (From LotR)
- Interesting arial battles (From Ep1)
- Kids with swords (From LotR)
- "Kill them slowly... AHHHH!" vs "Wipe them out, all of them... AHHHH!" (From Ep1)
All that said, this looks really cool, and as someone mentioned, this will be good filler while we wait for Lord of the Rings. And Marlon Wayans is funny, unlike Jar Jar.--brian
A better link - and a first Impression (Score:2)
I'm pretty excited about Lord of the Rings [apple.com], though.
Re:Conscience? (Score:5)
The Complete Alignment Table
First, the lawful characters:
Now the chaotic ones:
Chaotic Good: Download a copy of the movie from the 'Net. Watch it on a Linux machine.
Chaotic Neutral: Rolls a dice. 50% chance of paying to watch the movie.
Chaotic Evil: Buy a pirate copy of the movie. Hates the end of the movie, where the good guys always win.
Now the neutral bastards :-)
Waiting for LotR (Score:5)
The impossibly goody-two-shoes empress who believes everyone should be nice is gonna be the leader of the good guys?
Thanks to that Scary Movie guy for proving once again that in action movies, black guys should play the scared comedic thief with no morals and a thirst for easy cash.
Blue lipstick??? That's supposed to look evil?
If the dragons look like CGI at this resolution, can you imagine them on a movie screen?
"Then we'll make them go through a dungeon! Yeah! Because, you know, we've got dragons, but where are the dungeons? Huh?"
My little brother DM'ed stories that sounded more original when he was 11.
That being said, for some reason, I still find this exciting. First, it's gonna be a filler while we wait for LotR... And if they can make something that slick with the shoestring budget and two-bits director they have, can you imagine what Peter Jackson and a decent budget will turn up?
If I had a time machine, I'd go straight to Christmas 2001!
Re:hmmm (Score:2)
`ø,,ø`ø,,ø!
Re:DIRECT LINK HERE (Score:2)
Where are my mod points?
Not that I feel like downloading the trailer, but why the heck does /. give in to lame requests like that? When did linking become illegal?
Re:Chaotic Evil? (Score:2)
Then he'd steal the movie. (wouldn't want to miss it, whould he?)
`ø,,ø`ø,,ø!
Re:We both know there is more to D & D than that.. (Score:2)
Another guy goes into the military, gets demolitions training, then comes out and blows up a couple hundred Oklahoma civilians. Do you see them trying to ban the military???
NOOOOOO!!!!!!
Now, that's hypocracy for you.
`ø,,ø`ø,,ø!
Re:Give money to T-W (Score:3)
A stroke of originality! (Score:2)
Re:QuickTime in Linux? (off topic) (Score:3)
Don't worry, I'll pursue this further
Re:Come on! (Score:2)
Re:A little let down (Score:2)
Another reason to hate my PC (Score:2)
*twiddle thumbs*
*twiddle thumbs*
*twiddle thumbs*
*twiddle thumbs*
*twiddle thumbs*
*twiddle thumbs*
*twiddle thumbs*
*twiddle thumbs*
*twiddle thumbs*
Windows Media Player pops up
(CrudMaster.dll rolls dice)
Invalid File Format
(nothing in cache directory, either)
--
Re:Last frame of the trailer (Score:4)
Is Dungeons & Dragons really a Canadian conspiracy [standonguard.com] as many have suspected all along?
--
Time Warner (Score:2)
Just curious, and my brain is rather fried right now from trying to fix my network, so I really can't remember what they have done.
Re:Come on! (Score:2)
At least the black wisecracking sidekick isn't named 'Superfly'....
--
Re:DIRECT LINK HERE (Score:2)
Thus, doing a direct link actually screws up the net a little for everyone, or at least prevents it working in the way it's designed.
Note, it was a REQUEST.
As far as I can see,
I'm sorry, but I consider posting hard links to the akamai cache, especially after what seems a reasonable request rather than a legal vulture stomping session, is akin to 'polishing' a car with a sledgehammer with a cloth wrapped around the head, using repeated full swings, and justifying it saying 'it gives a deeper shine'...
Akamai's there for a good reason, and it works.. Please, don't go breaking it just for the sake of sheer bloody mindedness.
Malk
Re:Sigh... what are you kids thinking? (Score:2)
-
It looks like it's a genuine, honestly held belief.
- You may disagree with it, but that's not the point of moderation.
- I can't count.
- It's led to some serious discussion, but most people are now missing the source of the discussion by default.
- The issue of free speech gets it's real test when you have someone honestly speaking something you viciously disagree with.
- Don't you wish that book-burning christian sites would allow the geek reply in their space?? Well, here's a chance to live by example.
I defend to the death your right to speak your stupid opinion (and my right to respond).`ø,,ø`ø,,ø!
Giving money to T-W isn't the issue (Score:2)
-- Don't you hate it when people comment on other people's
Internet Keywords (Score:2)
Movie info. (Score:2)
http://us.imdb.com/Title?0190374 [imdb.com]
Conscience... (Score:3)
Conscience strikes: should I see this movie and give my money to Time-Warner?
Why not go to your cinema, pay to see a small, independent movie then when they let you in, 'accidentally' go into the wrong screen (These big multi-screen cinemas sure are getting big nowerdays) and watch it, whilst giving your money to the small independents?
It's not really legal, but as has ben said so many times before: It's not stealing unless something is missing.
Michael
...another comment from Michael Tandy.
Re:Conscience? (Score:4)
I don't agree with your table. The Good characters couldn't give money to Time-Warner. For the Lawful Good character, this means you can't watch the movie (unless perhaps you have a friend who already legitimately owns the movie, and you're watching it there, but even then a truly Good character might balk at it). The Neutral Good character is off campaigning for Nader, so he doesn't have time to watch movies. The Chaotic Good character snuck into the theater, and probably snuck in some snacks, too.
The Evil characters have no problem with giving money to Time-Warner. The Lawful Evil character has to pay in order to see the movie (but he probably already has contacts in the industry: good point). The Chaotic Evil character might pay, might not, but would definitely put his feet up on the chair in front of him, and would probably strew popcorn about and loudly make obscene comments during the movie. The Neutral Evil character goes to the movie, pays (it's easier that way), and at some point probably engages the Chaotic Evil character in combat sometime during the movie just to shut him up.
Those of Neutral Good/Evil alignment don't care about Time Warner. Of course, the Lawful Neutrals still pay. It's the other two Neutrals I don't know about. (And I've really never liked the idea that Chaotic Neutrals always roll dice to make their decisions for them. They don't like randomness, they like Chaos. They probably sneak into the movie precisely to make obscene comments.)
the saddest thing.... (Score:4)
How can we tell that this is a D&D movie over any other type of movie? Dragonheart was a D&D movie right? So was conan the barbarian , etc. Are we going to get to see a character get knocked over by a wayward dice roll? That would be the only definative way to tell it was a D&D movie.
They all owe their life to Lord of the Rings anyways so can't we say this is just a trailer that movies coming out? sorta like a compare and contrast thing with LoTR.
Re:Canadian government plot (Score:2)
when I type DnD into IE5... it leads me to think this movie is some sort of plot by the Canadian Armed Forces
These canadians have a thing called the Department of National Defense, leading to the acronym DND. This is in thier domain names (like http://www.dnd.ca/ [www.dnd.ca]).
Search engines tend to give priority to keywords found in domain names, because they tend to have more chance of having a relationship. This is happening here.
Michael
...another comment from Michael Tandy.
wow its huge.. (Score:2)
I don't want a lot, I just want it all!
Flame away, I have a hose!
Re:Movie info. (Score:2)
Erm....'nuff said.
Great visuals, poor acting... (Score:5)
- The bad, evil sorcerer keeps his hair parted, and when wind blows into his coiffed creation, he looks like Buster Poindexter.
- It co-stars Jar Jar Binks. Oh, wait, no, I guess that's just Marlon Wayans. Same thing.
- The main character says, "Trust me," right there in the trailer. The use of the phrase "trust me" in a trailer is a sign of impending crap storytelling 90% of the time. To my recollection, the only film that really bucked that trend was Raiders of the Lost Ark, which used "Trust me" in the trailer, but then didn't suck.
- The male lead looks like he's fresh from a Mighty Morphin Power Rangers casting call. It just seems "seriously wrong".
- The use of the word "kinda" in a fantasy setting.
It seems like this is pointed squarely at the teen movie market, but one would think that the market who would connect best with D&D is the 18-34 market (y'know, people who were alive when parents across the US were afraid that their role playing kids would become involved in the occult and commit suicide when their characters died).Admittedly, I don't know the story here. Maybe it's the same as the old D&D cartoon - a couple of kids are magically transplanted into the game and have to play it to get out. In that case, all this hokey teen crap works, because they would be from a different world, but if we are to believe that these characters were part of this world from day one...
Please, Peter Jackson, deliver us from bad fantasy films.
Re:Waiting for LotR (Score:2)
-Chris
"But it's the 5D100 that really drives you insa-a-a-a-ane."
Re:Great visuals, poor acting... (Score:2)
As for the modern day dialog in a fantasy setting, look no further than any dialog in Xena.
Tom Baker's in this? (Score:2)
This will be a geek extravaganza! Expect people camping in front of movie theaters for this and centerfolds in Starlog!